© 2026 Hedgehog Software, LLC
Twitter
GitHub
Discord
System
Light
Dark
More
Communities
Docs
About
Terms
Privacy
Search
Star
Feedback
Setup for Free
Discussion on Extending `@fast-check/vitest` vs. Direct `vitest` Usage - Effect Community
EC
Effect Community
•
2y ago
•
5 replies
thewilkybarkid
Discussion on Extending `@fast-check/vitest` vs. Direct `vitest` Usage
Great to see
@effect/vitest
@effect/vitest
extracted
. I
've been using
@fast-check/vitest
@fast-check/vitest
; would it make sense to extend that rather than
vitest
vitest
directly
?
@effect/schema
@effect/schema
already depends on
fast-check
fast-check
.
Effect Community
Join
Production-grade applications in TypeScript.
6,221
Members
View on Discord
Resources
ModelContextProtocol
ModelContextProtocol
MCP Server
Recent Announcements
Similar Threads
Was this page helpful?
Yes
No
Similar Threads
Vitest integration?
EC
Effect Community / 🚀-effect
3y ago
Inquiry about `@effect/vitest` support for `vitest@4`
EC
Effect Community / 🚀-effect
4mo ago
Discussion on Fork/Join Semantics in Effect 3 vs. Effect 4 FiberRefs
EC
Effect Community / 🚀-effect
12mo ago
Vitest Package Release Appreciation
EC
Effect Community / 🚀-effect
3y ago