Considering `Schema.combine` as a More Intuitive Alternative to `Schema.transform`
I'm sure this has been thought about loads and there's things I'm not considering but I've been playing with
At least in the example of what we were doing it was a case of combining two schemas into one, I'm not sure if
I'm mostly just talking aloud here btw and not expecting any changes
Schema.transform with @Stephen Bluck and am wondering if Schema.combine would be a more natural language of what it's actually doing?At least in the example of what we were doing it was a case of combining two schemas into one, I'm not sure if
transform does more and the name is more fitting but transform just feels very opaque as a function name (transform to what?). I'm mostly just talking aloud here btw and not expecting any changes
