EC

Effect Community•2y ago•

3 replies

mattphillips

Considering `Schema.combine` as a More Intuitive Alternative to `Schema.transform`

I'm sure this has been thought about loads and there's things I'm not considering but I've been playing with

Schema.transform

Schema.transform

with @Stephen Bluck and am wondering if

Schema.combine

Schema.combine

would be a more natural language of what it's actually doing?

At least in the example of what we were doing it was a case of combining two schemas into one, I'm not sure if

transform

transform

does more and the name is more fitting but

transform

transform

just feels very opaque as a function name (transform to what?).

I'm mostly just talking aloud here btw and not expecting any changes