dead-brown

`aggregationFn` types in `aggregatedCell`

Should there be some type-inference between

aggregationFn

aggregationFn

and

aggregatedCell

aggregatedCell

? I have a column with union type

'first' | 'second'

'first' | 'second'

, and for example

aggregationFn

aggregationFn

unique

unique

shows it as "first,second". The return type of

aggregatedCell.getValue()

aggregatedCell.getValue()

is still just the same union, but shouldn't it in theory be

('first' | 'second')[]

('first' | 'second')[]

? Same if I provide a custom

aggregationFn

aggregationFn

that returns an array.