Question about why Effect doesn't support method chaining syntax

Wondering why Effect doesn't support chaining. For ex,

I can't do following

Effect
    .succeed(10)
    .map(num => num + 1)
    .map(num => String(num))

Effect
    .succeed(10)
    .map(num => num + 1)
    .map(num => String(num))

Here is the valid Effect code using pipeline

pipe(
    Effect.succeed(10),
    Effect.map(num => num + 1),
    Effect.map(num => String(num)),
  )

pipe(
    Effect.succeed(10),
    Effect.map(num => num + 1),
    Effect.map(num => String(num)),
  )

I believe chaining is familiar syntax to Effect beginners than pipeline. Even those who are coming from OOPS world will be familiar with it.

Just trying to understand the rational behind not implementing map/flatmap/andThen within Effect values.

Effect Community•17mo ago

elango.dev

Question about why Effect doesn't support method chaining syntax

Wondering why Effect doesn't support chaining. For ex,

I can't do following

Effect
    .succeed(10)
    .map(num => num + 1)
    .map(num => String(num))

Effect
    .succeed(10)
    .map(num => num + 1)
    .map(num => String(num))

Here is the valid Effect code using pipeline

pipe(
    Effect.succeed(10),
    Effect.map(num => num + 1),
    Effect.map(num => String(num)),
  )

pipe(
    Effect.succeed(10),
    Effect.map(num => num + 1),
    Effect.map(num => String(num)),
  )

Question about why Effect doesn't support method chaining syntax

Similar Threads

Question about why Effect doesn't support method chaining syntax

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads