8 Replies
Not as far as I know, we have less interest for those AMD servers 😂
will it work if one builds the image themselves?
yes please add support for official rocm 6.2+ templates
This came up recently, maybe we can update the ROCm servers soon. Just a maybe. Can you open an issue on https://github.com/runpod/containers so I can track it?
GitHub
GitHub - runpod/containers: 🐳 | Dockerfiles for the RunPod cont...
🐳 | Dockerfiles for the RunPod container images used for our official templates. - runpod/containers
GitHub
No ROCm 6.3 template is available · Issue #83 · runpod/containers
I would like to have a ROCm 6.3 template available. I can find no ROCm templates in here at all on which I could conceivably build an upgraded template. Can I help with this, or is this in motion a...
I'd like to add my vote. I'm sure that one reason the AMD servers aren't popular is the old ROCm version. AMD has fixed quite a lot of stuff in the year since 6.1. (Tried to run a HIP program in the past but had problems. Now I'm looking forward to trying SCALE, but this requires ROCm 6.3.1. Though I might try installing ROCm myself to see if that's possible.)
yes this issue is circular;better images=more usage
@ET3D @bghira @Shlok I have added ROCm support to my Code Canvas template (Similar to the default templates but way more customizable): https://runpod.io/console/deploy?template=5nqn9gyd84&ref=svxge8hv
Its ROCm 6.4.1
6.3 I can try if its needed, older than 6.3 I am not interested in thats before AMD understood how to make installers
But i'd rather know how backwards compatible 6.4.1 is, my own software targets 6.4.1 to get newer GPU support so thats out of self interest
@Dj [OOO] if people need a newer ROCm you can now just redirect them to my template, saves runpod the hassle