Storage API, less folders preferred?
I've been noticing that my storage api usage has been getting a bit slower lately as our storage grows. We maintain pictures for orders, and originally did one folder per order, to easily keep the photos organized, but as we get over 200-ish orders, I am seeing image downloads take a bit longer than before. They still succeed eventually.
I've been instrumenting everything to help figure out the exact cause but I was wondering if anyone had run into this before, I didn't see any mention in the storage docs but does anyone know if it is preferred to have less folder for performance reasons? Our total disk usage is still very low.
Thanks for any information!
I've been instrumenting everything to help figure out the exact cause but I was wondering if anyone had run into this before, I didn't see any mention in the storage docs but does anyone know if it is preferred to have less folder for performance reasons? Our total disk usage is still very low.
Thanks for any information!
