Infinite yield possible on instance

I can't figure out why the type guard is failing for this component. Class declaration:

interface Instance extends Part {
    Part: Part;
}

@Component({ tag: 'AudioQueueDisplay' })
export class WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay extends BaseComponent<{}, Instance> implements OnStart {}

interface Instance extends Part {
    Part: Part;
}

@Component({ tag: 'AudioQueueDisplay' })
export class WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay extends BaseComponent<{}, Instance> implements OnStart {}

Compiled typeguard:

Reflect.decorate(WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay, "$c:components@Component", Component, { {
    tag = "AudioQueueDisplay",
    attributes = {},
    instanceGuard = t.intersection(t.instanceIsA("Part"), t.children({
        Part = t.instanceIsA("Part"),
    })),
} })

Reflect.decorate(WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay, "$c:components@Component", Component, { {
    tag = "AudioQueueDisplay",
    attributes = {},
    instanceGuard = t.intersection(t.instanceIsA("Part"), t.children({
        Part = t.instanceIsA("Part"),
    })),
} })

Full error:

15:38:00.477  [Flamework] Infinite yield possible on instance 'Workspace.AudioQueueDisplay.Part'  -  Client - componentTracker:169
15:38:00.477  Waiting for component 'client/components/AudioQueueDisplay/WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay@WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay'  -  Client - componentTracker:170
15:38:00.478  Waiting for the following criteria: type guard  -  Client - componentTracker:171

15:38:00.477  [Flamework] Infinite yield possible on instance 'Workspace.AudioQueueDisplay.Part'  -  Client - componentTracker:169
15:38:00.477  Waiting for component 'client/components/AudioQueueDisplay/WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay@WUIC_AudioQueueDisplay'  -  Client - componentTracker:170
15:38:00.478  Waiting for the following criteria: type guard  -  Client - componentTracker:171

Solution:

Yw ^w^

Jump to solution

61 Replies

wAD•4d ago

cannot extend it like thaat has type type Foo = Part & { Part: Part }

kv_OP•4d ago

I changed it to

type Instance = Part & {
    Part: Part;
};

type Instance = Part & {
    Part: Part;
};

but that compiles the same and the type guard still fails it is a normal part

kv_OP•4d ago

confusing to me because i also have this and it works

wAD•4d ago

no clue

kv_OP•4d ago

🥰 yippee

PepeElToro41•4d ago

maybe dont call it Instance because it would conflict with the Instance interface

kv_OP•4d ago

I did try that did not work :( I have also tried deleting my out folder

PepeElToro41•4d ago

Tester•4d ago

Can you show the structure of the instance when it fails to instantiate? Usually it happens when something is not anchored and falls through the map, or impacted by streaming

kv_OP•4d ago

i did notice that when i break on the warning the part is not there, but it is moreso confusing because the part is rendered before the script breaks

kv_OP•4d ago

i know its not replication/streaming since the object is obviously there ☹️

kv_OP•4d ago

Transparent object is the descendant

Tester•4d ago

Is it anchored? The part in a part? And is it named Part

kv_OP•4d ago

Both are anchored and the transparent part has cancollide disabled

Tester•4d ago

And how big is the map?

kv_OP•4d ago

not big <1000 studs

kv_OP•4d ago

the descendant is named part

Tester•4d ago

Can you add something into onStart Like a print Cause it might say that it's waiting for guard, but actually created after warning

kv_OP•4d ago

it does not print

Tester•4d ago

Mmm

kv_OP•4d ago

the component is obviously not constructing ever since otherwise it should be displaying a surfacegui

Tester•4d ago

Oh wait, might be the silly reason T_T

kv_OP•4d ago

unless it is and i have messed up the portal creation however i doubt it

Tester•4d ago

You have your interface named as the existing thing Aka Instance already exists

kv_OP•4d ago

also already been ruled out

Tester•4d ago

Mmm Other thing Can you override the predicate in @Component and print the instance structure There's a function called predicate Which decides whether the component should be instantiated Or even guard function I think I will give you insights on what's wrong And print the structure of the instance

kv_OP•4d ago

predicate does not run because instance guard fails first

Tester•4d ago

You sure? Isn't it wiseversa?

kv_OP•4d ago

@Component({
    tag: 'AudioQueueDisplay',
    predicate: (a) => {
        a.GetDescendants().forEach((d) => print(d.Name));
        return true;
    },
})

@Component({
    tag: 'AudioQueueDisplay',
    predicate: (a) => {
        a.GetDescendants().forEach((d) => print(d.Name));
        return true;
    },
})

i can also try it with the instance guard

Tester•4d ago

^ would be the best And can you do GetFullName instead

kv_OP•4d ago

if i am reading this correct i can not in fact do it with the instance guard

Tester•4d ago

return Flamework.createGuard<ComponentInstance>()(a)

kv_OP•4d ago

a callback with the proper return type is not a valid type and i am also not sure how to pipe the instance into the guard function i created

kv_OP•4d ago

since without a callback i cannot capture it? also the type assertion i need to do to pass a to createGuard seems like it will not work

Tester•4d ago

Put this, but just do this in the function for guard return Flamework.createGuard<ComponentInstance>()(a) as never ^ and careful You have to call it twice

kv_OP•4d ago

instance guard is the t.check type it cannot be a callback

Tester•4d ago

Remove as never for a sec

kv_OP•4d ago

ah ok its bc i wasnt calling it twice before that works

kv_OP•4d ago

Tester•4d ago

Mm?

kv_OP•4d ago

ahahahahahahaahha rojo did not sync any of those things i tried ever

Tester•4d ago

💔 Imagine...

kv_OP•4d ago

ok well there is this now

Tester•4d ago

Does it still warn?

kv_OP•4d ago

let me make it not aids to read yes

kv_OP•4d ago

the part seems to exist during the instance guard call?

Tester•4d ago

Wait, it told onStart worked

kv_OP•4d ago

yes it did im not sure what is happening now

Tester•4d ago

Can you remove your guard?

kv_OP•4d ago

it did construct

Tester•4d ago

And can you do override destroy(){ super.destroy(); print("Got destroyed") }

kv_OP•4d ago

its not being destroyed

Tester•4d ago

Ok, then it's great?

kv_OP•4d ago

ehh yes it is sort of fixed however the type guard initially still does not pass i still get the warning although the component does eventually construct

Tester•4d ago

Wut? Prob for the other thing? Can you search up instances with the same tag Prob you accidentally put it somewhere else

kv_OP•4d ago

yes the descendant was also tagged since it was duplicated from the parent i am not sure what fixed this but apparently something i did while rojo was dead fixed it thanks

Tester•4d ago

Prob the thing with changing it to type

Solution

Tester•4d ago

Yw ^w^

Gaming

Programming

Infinite yield possible on instance

Did you find this page helpful?