help

**❔ Better way of handling this?**

```cs
switch (syncMessage.type)
{
  case "Obj1": 
    Obj1.HandleUpdate(syncMessage.data);
    break;
  case "Obj2": 
    Obj2.HandleUpdate(syncMessage.data);
    break;
  case "Obj2": 
    Obj2.HandleUpdate(syncMessage.data); 
    break;
  default: 
    break;
}
```
Is there a better way of handling this? The objects all inherit from the same base abstract class which contains the HandleUpdate method. The syncMessage.type is a string and I don't think I can change that (not 100% sure)
It feels like the strategy pattern might be what I'm after but this implementation already uses 3 classes per object and I'd rather not add more. Any ideas? 

Edit: Cleaned code up to remove information irrelevant to the question

if the type is a string and matches the actual type, you could try something like...
```cs
List<AbstractBaseClass> objects = new () { Obj1, Obj2, Obj3 };
objects.Where(o => o.GetType().Name == syncMessage.type).FirstOrDefault()?.HandleUpdate(syncMessage.data);
```

Or similar.  It's not great, but might be the best you can do with that kind of input

Message Not Public

Message Not Public