❔ ✅ using multiple methods to object

.

ok so before reversing the string

we should convert it to an array, right?

why it's not number.ToArray().Reverse()

string already implements IEnumerable<char> so there's no need to

Also new string(numb.ToString()) isn't necessary, you can just do numb.ToString()

how about next line ?

if i remove new string it gaves an error

You need it there because ToArray() returns a char[], and new string creates a string from a char[].

i see

but what if i do it like this

insted of converting string -> array -> string

That won't work because you can't convert an IEnumerable<char> to a string.

Now i wonder what the fastest way to reverse is...

string.Create probably

Because it always is

But there's more nuance to it

Because you don't necessarily have to turn the number into a string first

however, that was not the question, so let's not get sidetracked

I wanna side track!

go to #allow-unsafe-blocks

thank you

!close

Closed!

Was this issue resolved? If so, run /close - otherwise I will mark this as stale and this post will be archived until there is new activity.