Need help dialing things in.

So now that I have most of my HW issues solved, I am focusing on the filaments and the print quality. My edges are the absolute worst. Anything at a 45° angle looks like garbage left out in the sun. The top layer is about as smooth as a dirt road in rural Africa. And I get a lot of those bits and bobs everywhere. Usually, after printing, I can find many of them either stick to my extruder or spread out over the bed. Ringing or ghosting is prevalent even after running multiple shaper_calibrate. Suggestions? Spectrum ASA 275 240° 7 0° bed 0.6 nozzle Superslicer 40% fan 10 second layer time 0.8mm retract at 50mm/s Other settings in the photos attached.
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
35 Replies
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
pa is too high or maybe not enough cooling try this 1. set PA to 0 (jsut to test it) 2. set overhang speed to 50 3. more cooling tis looks also overextruded EM tuning is a good idea
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
I'll give it a go in a minute. Thanks for the tips. My PA was at 0.005. Turned it down to 0.000. EM is as low as 0.9 using the squares method. I'll post photos and videos of the EM squares below. My extruder steps seems to be fine. I tell it to print 100 and it prints 100, so all seems ok. I also stepped down my speeds all the way from 200 to 100mm/s and the acceleration from 15k to 5k.
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
i have never seen such bad surfaces there is something totally off with your profile
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
I know 😦 And I can't figure it out. I have tried profiles from other users and tried to tweak them. To me, 0.9 seems like the best spot.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
top infill 75% ??????
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
I believe so. Let me double check.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
no need to check, i am asking your why you are setting it to these unusable values 75% means that you want to create a line that is smaller then the nozzle diameter
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Because I am desperate and have tried everything else 😦
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
some other values are way to high
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
I have tried all the way from 100 down to 75.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
dont play with your line width settings, set them to the defaults
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
100% or 0.6. Also tried. And will do it now again. I'll come back with the new batch after the test.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
to start with, just use 0.5 for all lines
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
The nozzle is a 0.6 Will that not make a difference?
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
a what? then use 0.6
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Sorry... num lock.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
i just have seen you are naming your profile 0.5mm ahh no, stuipid photo instead of screenshots nvm
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
I'll leave the EM at 0.9, which seems to give me the best surface, and set all lines to 0.6 and print out 3 squares.
optimistic-gold
optimistic-gold2y ago
What parameters do you change when use 0.6 nozzle?wall from 0.4 to 0.6 any other?
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
In this case I have already tried so many things I am pretty sure the profile I am using is broken. In any case, here is the most recent print. After @Helge Keck suggested it, I set all widths back to 100%. After first print, sorted out EM and PA back up to 0.005. Consistent with the last PA pattern test. Solved top surface, but messed up the corners again.
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
No description
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
turn PA off for the test, just to rule that out tiny bit overextruded
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
The surface is actually better than it looks. So adjust EM, right? I'll adjust that before I start messing with PA again.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
turn PA off until you sorted out your walll issues
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Left to right, zero PA and EM at 0.80, 0.85 and 0.90.
No description
No description
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Second photo is the under side, where I notice the first layer seems to have some gaps, not visible when putting down the layer. The last one was mismarked. It is 0.9. 0.85 seems to be the sweet spot.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
now print a test cube the xyz one its a quick print make it 40 mm big with the new EM value
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Will do.
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
Still printing, but you can tell the infill is crap and on the edges it has this serrated effect. Will take clearer images once done.
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
thgese are probably just the seams control it with our slicer preview
NMGMarques
NMGMarques2y ago
So... No change from previous settings. Straight up just loaded cube and hit send. Gaps on top. And the serrated issue. Happens on almost all edges. Not seams as per slicer preview.
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
No description
DemetriKarakashev
Did you figute out what caused this?
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server