K
Kysely12mo ago
decho

Ways to work with materialized views

Hey guys, I just wanted to ask before I embark on a journey on solving this problem on my own, if someone has found a good way to work with and implement materialized views with Kysely? I am currently using kysely-codegen but unfortunately it does not generate types for materialized views. kysely.introspect also does not return any data for materialized views either. My ultimate goal is to put a complex query in a materialized view (my leaderboard https://discord.com/channels/890118421587578920/1125059913551458406) and be able to do 3 things: 1. query the materialized view itself with kysely 2. use kysely to query the view itself SELECT * FROM my_materialized_view WHERE column = something 3. have types for it all 3 issues are solved if you have a tool that generates types for the materialized view (I think). --- So far I am thinking of two approaches. First one to be to just write my own types generator by querying pg_catalog and stuff, similar to kysely-codgen. Gonna take a while. Second solution would be to write a simple query in kysely which produces the result of the materialized view, wrap that in a function (which never gets called), and then write another function that returns raw query with type assertions.
import { sql } from 'kysely';

async function materializedQuery() {
// this func never gets called, just using it to create a type
return await db.selectFrom('countries').selectAll().execute();
}

async function materializedView() {
return await sql`select * from my_materialized_view`.execute(db) as unknown as ReturnType<typeof materializedQuery>;
}

/**
function materializedView(): Promise<{
id: number;
name: string;
}[]>
*/
import { sql } from 'kysely';

async function materializedQuery() {
// this func never gets called, just using it to create a type
return await db.selectFrom('countries').selectAll().execute();
}

async function materializedView() {
return await sql`select * from my_materialized_view`.execute(db) as unknown as ReturnType<typeof materializedQuery>;
}

/**
function materializedView(): Promise<{
id: number;
name: string;
}[]>
*/
This is obviously very hacky, and won't even solve problem #2. So I was just wondering if anyone faced this problem before and has any tips. Cheers!
Discord
Discord - A New Way to Chat with Friends & Communities
Discord is the easiest way to communicate over voice, video, and text. Chat, hang out, and stay close with your friends and communities.
Solution:
ok so here is what i ended up doing. 1. create a normal view in my database so kysely-codegen can generate types. 2. create exactly the same materialized view. 3. extend the generated DB and pass that to kysely, also exclude the normal view from it since I don't need it....
Jump to solution
19 Replies
Igal
Igal12mo ago
Hey 👋🏻 We could probably just add this to the introspector, and then do the same in kysely-codegen regardless, you can extend the types generated by kysely-codegen before passing them to Kysely instance, and provide the materialized views as regular tables.
decho
decho12mo ago
hey! thanks, that's a wonderful idea i did not think of, I assume you mean something like this, right?
interface DbWithMaterialized extends DB {
materializedView: {
column: string;
}
}

export const db = new Kysely<DbWithMaterialized>({
dialect: new PostgresDialect({
pool: new Pool({
// credentials
}),
}),
plugins: [new CamelCasePlugin()],
log: ['query'],
});
interface DbWithMaterialized extends DB {
materializedView: {
column: string;
}
}

export const db = new Kysely<DbWithMaterialized>({
dialect: new PostgresDialect({
pool: new Pool({
// credentials
}),
}),
plugins: [new CamelCasePlugin()],
log: ['query'],
});
that seems to work
Igal
Igal12mo ago
yeah
decho
decho12mo ago
👍 i also figured that instead of creating a function solely for the purpose of inferring it's type, i can just create a view in my database, then the codegen will create a type for it
Igal
Igal12mo ago
Btw, this is the why we don't get materialized views in getTables atm:
It's on purpose. The information_schema can only show objects that exist in the SQL standard. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3794.1412980686%40sss.pgh.pa.us
and this is what we may have to query, if we decide to support it https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/view-pg-matviews.html
PostgreSQL Mailing List Archives
Re: Materialized views don't show up in information_schema
Sehrope Sarkuni writes: > I've been testing out some of the new materialized view functionality > in 9.4 and …
PostgreSQL Documentation
54.13. pg_matviews
54.13. pg_matviews The view pg_matviews provides access to useful information about each materialized view in the database. Table 54.13. pg_matviews Columns Column Type …
decho
decho12mo ago
i assume that for some specific reason you're using information_schema only to introspect? something to do with the sql standard nvm that's incorrect
Igal
Igal12mo ago
I think its just an afterthought, same as with views, we initially didn't retrieve them. https://github.com/kysely-org/kysely/pull/273
GitHub
Introspect views by diogob · Pull Request #273 · kysely-org/kysely
Closes #270 Ensure all instrospector return database views and add a boolean isView to the TableMetadata so users can tell them apart. Todo document
decho
decho12mo ago
oh yeah, i saw this thread a few hours ago when researching, but it got no replies
decho
decho12mo ago
GitHub
Should the instrospectors' getTables method return database views? ...
As I was investigating how to implement the type generation for database views I found out that the MysqlIntrospector already returns views on a getTables call. If all introspectors would behave in...
Solution
decho
decho12mo ago
ok so here is what i ended up doing. 1. create a normal view in my database so kysely-codegen can generate types. 2. create exactly the same materialized view. 3. extend the generated DB and pass that to kysely, also exclude the normal view from it since I don't need it.
interface DBWithMaterializedViews extends Omit<DB, 'leaderboardView'> {
leaderboardMaterializedView: { [K in keyof DB['leaderboardView']]: NonNullable<DB['leaderboardView'][K]> }
}

export const db = new Kysely<DBWithMaterializedViews>({
dialect: new PostgresDialect({
pool: new Pool({
// credentials
}),
}),
plugins: [new CamelCasePlugin()],
log: ['query'],
});
interface DBWithMaterializedViews extends Omit<DB, 'leaderboardView'> {
leaderboardMaterializedView: { [K in keyof DB['leaderboardView']]: NonNullable<DB['leaderboardView'][K]> }
}

export const db = new Kysely<DBWithMaterializedViews>({
dialect: new PostgresDialect({
pool: new Pool({
// credentials
}),
}),
plugins: [new CamelCasePlugin()],
log: ['query'],
});
decho
decho12mo ago
now to see if it works it works thanks again Igal, hopefully sometime in the future codegen can generate types for materialized views, but for now this is an okay solution 👍
decho
decho12mo ago
btw, not sure why but all generated properties for view types are nullable, maybe that's intended too.
export interface LeaderboardView {
id: number | null;
platformId: string | null;
platform: PlatformName | null;
}
export interface LeaderboardView {
id: number | null;
platformId: string | null;
platform: PlatformName | null;
}
Igal
Igal12mo ago
interesting, not sure could be a bug
decho
decho12mo ago
all right
Igal
Igal12mo ago
worth raising in codegen repo
decho
decho12mo ago
GitHub
Not generating types for a Materialized View · Issue #72 · RobinBlo...
Hey! Thanks for the repo it's been saving me so much time! I've got a table and a corresponding materialized view that I've spun off of it to add further indices. It seems like the code...
Igal
Igal12mo ago
was talking about the everything being nullable in views
decho
decho12mo ago
oh after some quick research, apparently that's a postgres thing
decho
decho12mo ago
Stack Overflow
Why are my view's columns nullable?
I'm running PostgreSQL 9.2 on Windows. I have an existing table with some non nullable columns : CREATE TABLE testtable ( bkid serial NOT NULL, bklabel character varying(128), lacid integer...
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server
More Posts