![Rat Rig Community [Unofficial]](https://cdn.discordapp.com/icons/582187371529764864/08375bea6b5b9088b6d4cfc2b6e25fba.webp?size=48){kind=icon}
will more tuning help?
Hiya,
I’ve spent a couple of hours trying to figure out the dark magic of belt tensioning on my enclosed vc3.1 300z
I started with trying to set a rough belt tension using spectroid based on the advised 85 to 110 Hz frequency for a vc300.
From there I used the ADXL with the belt tensioning macro to test and tweak the tension graph. The result of a couple of hours attached.
This work gained me about 25% acceleration increase on my X-axis based on the input shaping graph.
I was wondering - should I keep tuning to get it closer to that ideal 2-peak fully aligned belt tension graph?
If yes, what would the benefit be? Or better yet - what would a well tuned vc300 input shaper graph look like?
Any additional advice on how I might reach that is very welcome.
I’ve spent a couple of hours trying to figure out the dark magic of belt tensioning on my enclosed vc3.1 300z
I started with trying to set a rough belt tension using spectroid based on the advised 85 to 110 Hz frequency for a vc300.
From there I used the ADXL with the belt tensioning macro to test and tweak the tension graph. The result of a couple of hours attached.
This work gained me about 25% acceleration increase on my X-axis based on the input shaping graph.
I was wondering - should I keep tuning to get it closer to that ideal 2-peak fully aligned belt tension graph?
If yes, what would the benefit be? Or better yet - what would a well tuned vc300 input shaper graph look like?
Any additional advice on how I might reach that is very welcome.
![Rat Rig Community [Unofficial] banner](https://cdn.discordapp.com/banners/582187371529764864/4ee3e42e227d6aac26f048a3e69d5924.webp?size=480)