Allowlist for PFIs
Cheers to keeping with the times, @chrisgiglio! Inclusivity, including the language we use, is a principal pillar of the open source program. https://developer.tbd.website/open-source
14 Replies
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
@plew | TBD ^
My opinion: "allowlist" is a commonly-understood term in this context, pivoting to something else to accommodate the permissionless nature of the protocol would be confusing. Curious what others think.
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
TBH I'm not sure what the allowlist is for in tbDEX. 🙂
"wallets have a choice of which PFIs"?
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Yeah in that case it makes sense to me - tbDEX is permissionless, some wallets may choose which PFIs they'll support.
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Definitely defering to those with closer domain experience here.
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Yep that’s consistent to me @chrisgiglio - a pessimistic policy with allowlisting
Unknown User•11mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
“Trusted list”?
Unknown User•10mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
For “permissionless” I’m more clear - tbDEX from the beginning as a protocol does not have an authority determining who does or does not participate.
Wallets and PFIs are free to make this distinction as you say 🙂