W
Windmill•5mo ago
jmr

Questions around licensing

I've got a few questions around use of AGPL as well as enterprise licensing. 1. AGPL suggests that software must be kept open source if changed. I assume I am ok to use it in a commercial setting as long as I don't modify the software, and it stays internal to the company. I assume things that I run via windmill do not get tainted with AGPL, (nor does building a docker image on top of windmill image adding company CA certs). 2. We have a secondary company that provides operational support for us (eyes on glass, 24hr on call), as we don't run that ourselves. We provide the scripts, they make sure they run, rerun in case of failures etc. Is it in breach of the open-source license if we expose windmill scripts to the support company? All the support people would be operators only. 3. My idea to use windmill doesn't really fit in with where windmill positions itself. Namely I am mostly looking for a ui for running and configuring parameterizable cron jobs that can be kicked off ad-hoc (script does some argument validation). The scripts that we'd run via windmill would just do a submission to our internal compute farm, and windmill would mostly sit there in a loop polling for that to complete. The submission starts a process that needs to stay alive (bring back logs, process disappearing suggests cancellation etc), so I can't move the "waiting for it to complete" into some sort of flow loop that reduces the execution time (from windmills perspective). This in nature makes the enterprise license not really viable, as we'd be paying quite a lot for windmill just to sit and sleep in a loop. These jobs that we submit to our compute farm can run for 2-3 days so we'd have scripts that would run for this long in a single script execution. Perhaps windmill is not the right product for us, atleast when it comes to enterprise license?
2 Replies
rubenf
rubenf•5mo ago
1. Correct, agpl extends to our software, not your scripts. Same with CA. 2. Exposing it to the second company would be distributing the software so you would have to open-source your modifications but if there are no modifications, then as long as you're fine with the community features, you're all good. 3. We're pretty flexible with pricing for particular needs so it might be worth chatting with us. The enterprise edition is not just for software, you get to become a partner with a spot on our roadmap and support 🙂
jmr
jmr•5mo ago
Thanks, this sounds reassuring. I'll see how the proof of concept goes, and we might be in touch.