Write Rebuttal of Nature Article against X-Risk

This article was posted in Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02094-7#Echobox=1687881012

It is silly and does not have much rhetorical strenght. A shame for Nature really. Writing a detailed rhetorical rebuttal should be easy.

I will be project lead on this one but may not have much time to write it myself

Help Needed
I am ideally looking for:
  • A writer/researcher: Somebody who understands rhetoric well enough, can go through the article, isolate every argument, identify rhetorical fallacies and quickly research the facts behind the arguments if there are any. I can offer mentoring
  • A reviewer: Somebody who can read the rebuttal and offer constructive feedback
Talk of artificial intelligence destroying humanity plays into the tech companies’ agenda, and hinders effective regulation of the societal harms AI is causing right now.
Was this page helpful?