reverse geocoding inaccuracy
I know this most likely isn't an immich issue, but it seems the reverse geocoding process is quite inaccurate in some cases.
See the example in attached screenshot. This location is clearly in the city of Paris, not even too close to its limits (the blue circle), but it is tagged as being in "Bagnolet" (suburb just outside Paris, on the eastern side).
This is not correct.
Same goes for all 18 pics under the other cluster (tagged as in "Saint-Ouen", another adjacent surbub).
The only pic that immich really locates in Paris is the one showing as a thumbnail (single pic in this cluster)
And since Paris is its own "administrative county" ("State" level in the new search engine), you can't even see all those pictures together by not selecting a City.
I'm not sure if this is something that should be reported to the geocoding service used by immich, but it definitely leads to a poor experience here
See the example in attached screenshot. This location is clearly in the city of Paris, not even too close to its limits (the blue circle), but it is tagged as being in "Bagnolet" (suburb just outside Paris, on the eastern side).
This is not correct.
Same goes for all 18 pics under the other cluster (tagged as in "Saint-Ouen", another adjacent surbub).
The only pic that immich really locates in Paris is the one showing as a thumbnail (single pic in this cluster)
And since Paris is its own "administrative county" ("State" level in the new search engine), you can't even see all those pictures together by not selecting a City.
I'm not sure if this is something that should be reported to the geocoding service used by immich, but it definitely leads to a poor experience here
