DII
DevHeads IoT Integration ServerCamila_99$$

Okk thank you Mike I’m curious, 🧐 have

Okk thank you Mike I’m curious, 🧐 have you encountered any specific challenges or drawbacks when compared to LoRa? I’m always interested in learning from others.
InsightMike
InsightMike•36d ago
Each technology has its own "best fit" applications. LoRaWAN is effectively a network so has a number of networking related functions that wouldn't be necessary for point to point communications, which means the receiver is actually a "gateway" so has more hardware and software involved. You can also just use the physical layer, "LoRa" without using the LoRaWAN network stack, but that becomes a more proprietary solution. Bluetooth with the coded PHY feature is likely the easiest integration and lowest hardware costs for your point to point needs. At 2.4GHz, it will be more affected by the trees in your signal path than LoRa will. It should still have enough margin tomeet your range needs - but good to test that in the field first!
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server
More Posts
ONE: Open-Source Self-Balancing Unicycle RobotONE is a self-balancing unicycle robot project using IMU technology and STM32 microcontrollers. It'sAny advice on choosing a servo motor ?Hello! I would like some advice on choosing a servo motor. It would be used to create rotating metalHow do I select the size and shape of a brushless motor propeller?Hi everyone there!! Can anyone give a tutorial about how to chose brushless motors propeller (sire aWhy are some messages not received in ZeroMQ inter-process communication despite correct config?So guys I'm using ZeroMQ for inter-process communication in my application. I have two separate proc