NLooking for feedback on this. I bolded the title I liked the most: https://hackmd.io/Z4tulTOHSRSATZWPKeQEPQ
J25 or 50 minute talk?
N50 minute talk.
Jok so we have 500 words
Nyeah, I did a word count and we are under 500 words.
JI'll cut down the webpage copy pasta a bit
NSounds good, I wasn't sure how best to explain it, so I just grabbed stuff from the Universal Blue Web Page 
Jyeah I'll just cut it down for brevity so we can say more meaty stuff
JI think a lot of the tooling stuff might not be what they want since there's no real benefit to Fedora explaining github stuff
Jso maybe it's more patterns and lessons learned vs. "first we have this repo, then we have this repo"
Nlessons learned and adopted?
Jyeah I added to the bottom
Jrecommendations for fedora's base images can cover things like trying to match what's in workstation
Jbecause it's different in upstream, silverblue and workstation don't have the same package set.
NI thought they were pretty similar? what differences should we highlight?
Jit's in packages.json
Jtcpdump, symlinks, among some others
Nsounds good, I can review main and highlight some of that stuff in the presentation
Jthere's a link somewhere in the upstream tracker about the package differences
Jand then for infrastructure lessons learned
Jwe need to highlight that we need official images and that they must be signed with sigstore
Jthen that will hopefully be a bullet they can use to talk infra fixes
Jotherwise, lgtm, shorter and more focused seems better.
Joh one more
NIf there is one thing I know, if I don't read things, other people definitely don't read things lol
Jthat one will be important
Jif it gets accepted we can have a slide per part of strategy and then how ublue is helping with each one
Nshould we throw that in the topics section?
Jwe aligned with those early on
Jyeah, let me try it
Jlet me find the actual goals
NSo appreciative of the help! 
MPackages still not using tmpfiles.d to create stuff in /var after boot.
Jthere we go
Nawesome.
J"Fedora Strategy 2028" is what they call it
JWe're pretty much aligned with all of it, which we tried to do when we started so that's good at least.
Nexcellent.
NI think it looks excellent now. What are your thoughts on the title I picked?
JI personally don't refer to "the future" with any of this
Jbut any of those is fine
Nwe do on the website.
Nwhich is where I yanked that from.
Jwell we say that on the website because "Powered by 2016, delivered today" sounds way worse lol.
JI'm more inclined to "let's move with a purpose" to a flock audience than the general populace.
NI agree with that. That's why I made it more generally about Universal Blue than any one of our downstreams.
JLike, "stop saying this is the future" because then they constantly find excuses with things like "but this isn't ready", "what about users who use spacebar heaters?" and then meander in the desert instead of "wow, we are really behind and need to get moving"
Jwe don't want to say that explicitly
Jbut also fedora has consistently moved the goalposts on this stuff and we need to help them bust out of the loop
Nyeah, that is a great point.
