Is `min-width` necessary or best practice for containers?
Hi community,
I have this situation where I have a page that has a single card with content inside.
As I learned in CRL course, I set its width with
However, someone elsewhere recommended me to set a
My thinking though is that there are no screens of that side.
I assume what they have in mind is at that point with
For me, though, there is no point on spending time on preparing for situations that don't exist... there are no screens of like 200 px wide, I think (and if there are, how do you even read?).
But what they argued to this is that if you kind of scale the screen (I suppose with zoom out or something like that) then in that case it would matter.
I was left a little puzzled.
In your experience, is that right to think about those extra tiny sizes?
If so, do you set
And if so, is that kind of compatible with the
Thanks in advance for your insight!
I have this situation where I have a page that has a single card with content inside.
As I learned in CRL course, I set its width with
width: min(90%, 24rem);However, someone elsewhere recommended me to set a
min-widthMy thinking though is that there are no screens of that side.
I assume what they have in mind is at that point with
min-widthFor me, though, there is no point on spending time on preparing for situations that don't exist... there are no screens of like 200 px wide, I think (and if there are, how do you even read?).
But what they argued to this is that if you kind of scale the screen (I suppose with zoom out or something like that) then in that case it would matter.
I was left a little puzzled.
In your experience, is that right to think about those extra tiny sizes?
If so, do you set
min-widthAnd if so, is that kind of compatible with the
min(%,rem)Thanks in advance for your insight!
A friendly place for developers to meet other devs, ask questions, get help, and just have a good time 🙂.
36,263Members
Resources
Similar Threads
Was this page helpful?
