> [THREAD] `FEEDBACK` - *AS A USER...
[THREAD] FEEDBACK - *AS A USER...: (User-stories feedback thread, simple, single org/user account feedback.)9 Replies
As a user: I should have the autonomy to set this to be 'dismissed' perpetually, and/or config'd to different levels of 'verbosity' as to leverage the notification area for user attention, and prevent 'noise-deafness', it should be able to be set to various 'levels of communication' such as; "ALL", "ALERTS", "UPDATES", "NEWS", "TIPS", etc... .
AS A USER:
- I should have the option to select whether to delete all, or a select category or two, or more, etc. (Or possibly even a hover expended picklist?)
Are comments like these helpful, should they continue, or would you prefer to dial back to
critical and/or bugs only?
^bump 👆 - @James4u , anyone?Thanks for your feedback
so are you talking about batch delete here?
batch, or simply select one or two or many or all, within teh UI, (ideally at all locations where its' intuitive and
with flow to delete {any-interface-object} (namely in the case, the traycer objects produced from user interactions. Example: for a list, there are 0-many items. I may want to delete one, two, all, etc., (Disclaimer, I'm a super-heavy-user, but NOT a front-end-developer. I'm just a language programmer) But as a user, I think if I interacted in a way that would enable me to easily accomplish the deletion of one or more elements from one or more 'tabs' (security, Clarity, etc.), that this would make my life easier. (Maybe not DELETE but probably better to ARCHIVE/cache for potential future recall, or reference context, or undo user error(s).?
make sense?AHA!!! (at least for me, this seems to connect dots better, but I don't believe it should be that ambiguous that a 'logical' optional next step may be to simply transition to
REVIEW, then click, then engage with TRAYCER-COMMENT(S) via bottom panel.
But this was additional iterative exploration I was looking for, and couldn't find earlier.
nice work team-traycer@Ankit @Hardik Shingala @James4u (please share if not best to any/all of you)
However, throoughout a few hours of testing, there are some chat-cycles where it doesn't seem to want to find/map/bind the
Apply as intended... I caught on to a deeper session here, and captured the logs for your reference/debugging... Hope it helps some.Thank you for sharing the logs @TheDavidYoungblood@LouminAI-Labs. We will check what went wrong.