Proposal to Add `interface Any` Extending `Effect<any, any, any>` for Type Constraints

Have you considered adding

interface Any extends Effect<any, any, any>

interface Any extends Effect<any, any, any>

? It seems convenient when imposing constraints on type parameters of generic functions, and it appears more compact in type hints. On the downside, it might be confused with

Effect<any>

Effect<any>

. What do you think? Is it worth adding this to the Effect namespace?

Communities Docs About Terms Privacy

Proposal to Add `interface Any` Extending `Effect<any, any, any>` for Type Constraints - Effect Community

Proposal to Add `interface Any` Extending `Effect<any, any, any>` for Type Constraints

Similar Threads

Proposal to Add `interface Any` Extending `Effect<any, any, any>` for Type Constraints

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads