Why prisma instead of drizzle?
The only thing not to love about wasp is the decision to go with prisma instead of drizzle.
One of the articles in the blog talks about how other attempts of creating the "Lavarel" of JS failed likely because they got to tightly coupled to the wrong technology (next js, etc).
After reading Miho's answer in regards to replacing prisma with drizzle, I'm wondering if the Wasp team didn't, quite ironically, made the same mistake they pointed out on other wannabe JS full-service frameworks.
(at least, this sound a lot like tightly to me, and I'm afraid that a decision that made sense when it was made have become now tech debt we need to live with for the foreseeable future even when a much better alternative exists...)
One of the articles in the blog talks about how other attempts of creating the "Lavarel" of JS failed likely because they got to tightly coupled to the wrong technology (next js, etc).
After reading Miho's answer in regards to replacing prisma with drizzle, I'm wondering if the Wasp team didn't, quite ironically, made the same mistake they pointed out on other wannabe JS full-service frameworks.
(at least, this sound a lot like tightly to me, and I'm afraid that a decision that made sense when it was made have become now tech debt we need to live with for the foreseeable future even when a much better alternative exists...)
