Licensing Confusion
I'm struggling to understand the licensing model a bit. I'm working on a FOSS project that has more contributors than just myself -- does that mean we're ineligible for the community license? Would that put us under the non-profit organization bucket?
6 Replies
You can use the community license, since the project is FOSS. We want to make the license as clear as possible, can you clarify what you find confusing?
I am unsure if you are referring to CheerpJ or CheerpX, but the licensing is identical so it should not matter
In particular, I got confused because the wording around the community license emphasizes “personal” and “single-developer” open-source projects, so I wasn’t 100% sure if the intention was to group non-personal FOSS projects under the non-profit org bucket. Thanks for the clarification.
I'll report this to the team to make sure the terms are clarified.
As a matter of fact the licensing has been already clarified here: https://cheerpj.com/licensing/
CheerpJ
CheerpJ Licensing | CheerpJ
The licensing pages in the docs still need to be refreshed to adopt the same wording
Ah, yup I just ended up on the docs page instead of that one.