Coder parameter form type textarea
I have set this form type, the UI not show textarea

12 Replies
@kirby could you help them how to set it up? I guess this is still a WIP and has not been released
Maybe we should add a warning on provider docs for the minimum required Coder version
Or better an error in the build if someone tries to use a newer feature not available in their Coder server version.
Hello, this is because
form_type
is only supported by the new workspace create page that supports dynamic parameters.
This is not yet released. The terraform provider is ahead of coder
in that respect(@Lexa)
Okay thankyou for your work hard, I will be patient wait this feature.
Thank you! Keep an eye on the release notes!
Just as a heads up, dynamic parameters is now released in early access on v2.22 behind an unsafe experimental flag. There are some limitations that may cause existing templates to break. A more stable release of the feature will be out soon.
@Stephen i looked in codersdk/deployment.go and see a 'dynamic-parameters' experiment, but if i try, the admin dashboard says it is invalid. if I use *, prebuilds is the only experiment.
hey, it’s an unsafe experiment so we skip it with the wildcard.
You have to explicitly opt in. I’d probably suggest holding off until the next release to play with it
okay, that is what i thought, but like i said, when i explicitly added dynamic-parameters, the dashboard says it is invalid.
fyi, docs for the early access are available at https://coder.com/docs/admin/templates/extending-templates/parameters#dynamic-parameters
but i would still recommend holding off as kirby suggested
for sure. i upgraded mainline to yesterday's, and the unsafe experiment at least shows the wild new workspace form with a bunch of errors, so i'll hold off. oddly, in the admin dashboard, an error message says dynamic-parameters is an invalid experiment, yet it lists it below in the experiments section. when done, this feature sounds beneficial.
Yeah, I also noticed that valid experiments are showing as invalid on the dogfood instance too