conc. cell

if by chnce i want to calculate the emf value do we apply like conc. cell formula here or ?? do we calc ulate the new emf of both the solution and then do the normal way to get to emf??
No description
18 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
flower
flower3mo ago
No Nernsr Eqaution
flower
flower3mo ago
Yes voice notes are superior Yes they are loud Yes I had the phone practically in my mouth (not really)
Sephrina
SephrinaOP3mo ago
no nersrt equation or no, nersrt equation hn mtlb dono ka alg alag karke karenge na?
flower
flower3mo ago
a and b part ka Ofc Yes Bro Obv Ek hi time pe
Sephrina
SephrinaOP3mo ago
ki al ka new nikala and then uska
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
Same result dega dono
flower
flower3mo ago
Aayein
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
Individually if the rxn potential is +ve, and overall if cell rxn +ve
Sephrina
SephrinaOP3mo ago
what i am saying is in a part pehle al ka new nikalenge na emf taki usko standard wale me add karke emf nikale
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
No description
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
Just came home, anyways ig this is what you meant
flower
flower3mo ago
OHH ye puch rahi thi?? why would you wanna do the 2nd thing but yea it would be the same thing just make sure that n be same cuz that might get messed up somewhere
Sephrina
SephrinaOP3mo ago
ys i was asking this hn +solved @coolguy.
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@888280831863451688> (888280831863451688)
Time
<t:1749490135:R>
Solved by
<@765933523705921606> (765933523705921606)

Did you find this page helpful?