I
iTeachChem•3mo ago
Sephrina

charge

why dont we take in account of the charge of proton while getting the e- no.
No description
17 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•3mo ago
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•3mo ago
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
flower
flower•3mo ago
becuase in electrostatics we only deal with charges coming due to electrons only convention hai always electrons will be going from place to place, getting added or subtracted yes you might find "body is given positive charge" all that means is that electrons were removed protons are assumed to be fixed stationary in the nuclei of solid structures ke atoms therefore they arent even considered to be accounted for oh wait this is something else welp ignore my yapps
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
hn ye chiz maine reasd kiya tha but wont the no. of proton affect the charge?
flower
flower•3mo ago
no we dont we only deal charges in electrons ye to clear hai idhar i think bas confuse karne ke liye diya hai that protons are this much
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
phir to hn thik hai
flower
flower•3mo ago
idk i havent calced this otu
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
worked i think
flower
flower•3mo ago
calc kara??
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
hn with proton aara hai 4.8 and without aara hai 3
flower
flower•3mo ago
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm i think yea just confusion cuz no. of protons wont affect the charge on body only exchange of electrons do im high on matrices goddamn this took long to think through 💀
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
hn varna to thik hi araa hai
flower
flower•3mo ago
yupps
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
confusing hota hai suna hai maine
flower
flower•3mo ago
nahh just require caution in calc
Sephrina
SephrinaOP•3mo ago
ooo +solved @Phalawor
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•3mo ago
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@888280831863451688> (888280831863451688)
Time
<t:1750100942:R>
Solved by
<@964432960197632059> (964432960197632059)

Did you find this page helpful?