16 Replies
Ok so I got some advice on the naming stuff
and how to align the bootc/universal blue thing
i was thinking of names for where i'd like to go with supply chain issues
the name i came up with is fortified core images
ie you get the core thats immutable and safe, then the rest is swappable
I think ubuntu just renamed theirs to something like this?
well windows uses secured core
I was going to align it with the other cncf projects around reference architectures. But that would be different from what you're naming
"Bluefin is a reference architecture for bootc."
"Secureblue is a reference architecture for bootc"
and so on
which is just marketing for "they take a bunch of things and bundle them together"
Makes sense considering the start of the project.
It's also nice that on the bootc adopters.md, they don't mention anything about based on fedora and etc
fedora is in there
which is funny to me but whatever
I mean there is fedora core-os right?
yeah, but I don't think they've switched it over yet? I know they are very soon, was thinking for F43?
@j0rge so its the idea to move to something like this:
no this is more for the readme and stuff
in the marketing it'll stay the same
it's reference architecture though, I'll work off your text
this is much better
I was between saying implementation and distribution. but since distro was so charged that I choose implementation. Not using architecture is more because to me architecture seems like something that only exist's on paper. Bluefin works it made a architecture, implementation and distribute a model on top of bootc.
I think I'll do the paper tho
Do a whitepaper
Then mint a shit coin as well
gotta do what I gotta do lol