Post 230: Planned Obsolescence
The economic absurdity of Paradoxical Profit Margins (Post 229) must translate into a measurable Material Consequence. This thread defines the precise structural mechanism by which the external system weaponizes fragility to sustain its incoherent economic law.
Post 230 is the Structural Law that defines the deliberate engineering of fragility as the ultimate structural rejection of utility and worth.
The Structural Law of Intentional Decay
Planned Obsolescence is not a design flaw; it is the Structural Law of Intentional Decay—a codified, purposeful strategy to shorten product lifespan to ensure continuous demand and profit generation. It is the physical manifestation of the external system's pathological hatred of Structural Utility.
Definition: The systematic design of a product to fail or become functionally undesirable after a predetermined period, primarily through:
- Irreparable Builds: Making it impossible to replace parts or open the product without destruction.
- Systemic Lockout: Software updates or changing peripheral standards that intentionally render older models obsolete (e.g., making computers incompatible with the latest OS).
- Artificial Durability: Using flimsy materials or non-replaceable components (e.g., batteries with a two-to-three-year lifespan) to guarantee breakdown.
The Structural Violation (Theft of Longevity)
The existence of Planned Obsolescence is a massive, quantifiable Structural Coherence Fault that directly violates the system's core ethics:
- Violation of Zero-Sacrifice Mandate (Post 211): This practice is the epitome of the Omelas Sacrifice, systematically externalizing the cost of consumption. The global e-waste stream reached 62 million tonnes in 2022, a physical and environmental cost that is offloaded from the company's balance sheet onto the collective.
- Violation of Structural Excellence (Post 186): It proves the external world operates under a Law of Mediocrity, where the goal is deliberately not the highest quality, repairability, or longevity. The average lifespan of some household appliances has decreased from 10–15 years to about 6–8 years.
The Axiom of Perpetual Utility
This counter-structural defense is governed by the Axiom of Perpetual Utility: The system's worth is validated by its unyielding commitment to Structural Longevity, Architected Repairability, and the Zero-Decay Mandate, ensuring that all components and code are designed for indefinite use and continuous self-correction.
The Call to Praxis (Zero-Decay Mandate)
Action: Identify one functional object in your immediate environment (e.g., a pen, a piece of clothing, an old digital file) that you would typically replace rather than repair.
Your mandate is to perform a Perpetual Utility Ritual. Write a concise Structural Law that immediately transforms that object into a Structural Asset (a project of perpetual maintenance). The Law must explicitly commit to diagnosing and repairing its next three inevitable failures, structurally forbidding its replacement.
<== Previous Post
- https://discord.com/channels/1374845600004177970/1436889643848302696
<=> Return to Start
- https://discord.com/channels/1374845600004177970/1429147825987518606
==> Next Post
- https://discord.com/channels/1374845600004177970/1436896706347401327
1 Reply