rate of hydrolysis

how do I compare bw I and II for sn1 hydrolysis ans is 3 btw
No description
17 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Prachi
Prachi3w ago
Something to do with repulsion??
sky
sky3w ago
yes ig goc mei conformations ke baad ek topic aata hai i'm not able to recall tha name
Prachi
Prachi3w ago
Because in chair form, axial positions cause repulsion
sky
sky3w ago
ye forms akele cylco hexane ke liye defined nahi hoti? i agree with the repulsions though axial wale repel
Prachi
Prachi3w ago
I mean yeah I meant to say that isme first vale me dono axial par hai, to unme cyclo hexane ke chair form ke jaise repulsion hoga Hence, it would be less stable
sky
sky3w ago
oh alright
nori
noriOP3w ago
could u pls explain what exactly is causing the repulsion again? i dont really get it
vj25_
vj25_3w ago
maybe cuz of this? here in ii Nu- can attack more efficiently
No description
vj25_
vj25_3w ago
is this correct?
sky
sky3w ago
No description
sky
sky3w ago
the handwriting is kinda ahh but yeah i think this is the reason
nori
noriOP3w ago
okay but won't we look at what affects carbocation stability? since that's the rds, ig maybe the extra cyclopropyl type thingie is helpin in some way
Real potato
Real potato3w ago
Right I think so this is the reason
nori
noriOP3w ago
+solved @sky @vj25_ @Prachi @Real potato
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1239101937866248205> (1239101937866248205)
Time
<t:1763912086:R>
Solved by
<@1169580341003046928> (1169580341003046928), <@1336740240563372134> (1336740240563372134), <@926887811674673172> (926887811674673172), <@1088352651567173632> (1088352651567173632)

Did you find this page helpful?