Interaction Handlers!!
Hello peeps!
I know, I know, allllll of you (myself included) are just basically begging me for application commands in Sapphire (and they're coming, don't you worry π), but we have to start slow. For now, I have some proper "documentation" on interaction handlers! π
Are you ready to be HYPED?! (I hope.. please.. I'm trying my best here ;w;)
Have a read: https://vladfrangu.notion.site/Handling-Interactions-not-Application-Commands-in-Sapphire-92e307005b9f4e3b849663ea43c57701
I'll also turn this message in a thread, so leave alll your feedback, thoughts and whatnot in it! π π₯Ί
24β’956d ago
This is what I kinda wished I had- separate verification versus running. This is awesome.
or the ability to have separate things :)
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
I feel like you could use the table you have to give other words when you can so it makes the thing clearer to those who don't understand the ones used.
For example, you have "SelectMenu" corresponding to "Select menus". You could make it correspond to "Drop-down lists" or something like that
vladdyβ’956d ago
is the edit better?
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
Perfect!
vladdyβ’956d ago
π
Also notion.so? God bless whoever made it
24β’956d ago
if this is your first time on notion
π you're going to the moon
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
By the way I don't really understand the example, probably because they're in nodeJS directly and not typescript haha
But like I don't know where the code you show should be
maybe it's just because I read the entire thing in 15 seconds lol
vladdyβ’956d ago
RIGHT
Sawakoβ’956d ago
damn, very good guide
vladdyβ’956d ago
Thats something I forgot to write
LOL
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
I was expecting the "How do we actually use all of this?" to clarify things but
24β’956d ago
Could you outline an example using both parse and run returning custom data?
I think this could be incredible to share data between the validation state and the running state, and seeing an example could help people understand the usage of this.
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
:p
vladdyβ’956d ago
Added the section for what the fuck are these
Hope that helps
Technically, both examples in the parse section show how parse and run interact together
vladdyβ’956d ago
Vlad Frangu's Notion on Notion
Handling Interactions (not Application Commands) in Sapphire
For a long time, the demand for interaction handlers in Sapphire has grown exponentially with time! The good news is that I finally have something to show you, and I think this will allow for some super clean code on your side!
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
Oh waw such a small section and yet it enlightens everything LOL
amazing
Just need typescript versions of the code now <:Angel_Panda:832084860067250186>
24β’956d ago
Ah, ok. I missed that entirely somehow. Thanks.
vladdyβ’956d ago
24β’956d ago
(I didn't see the type π)
Would this result in type completion, or would we need to type stuff ourselves?
(I will assume the latter)
Sawakoβ’956d ago
@vladdy could you do the guide on the other sapphire stuff? is that you do it very 
MC Princessβ’956d ago
donβt make vlad do anything else. weβre just now getting all this out of the way. the guides will come in 10 years lol
24β’956d ago
24β’956d ago
Link to the docs.
vladdyβ’956d ago
What type? @twenty_four
Sawakoβ’956d ago
It's 
vladdyβ’956d ago
Vlad Frangu's Notion on Notion
Handling Interactions (not Application Commands) in Sapphire
For a long time, the demand for interaction handlers in Sapphire has grown exponentially with time! The good news is that I finally have something to show you, and I think this will allow for some super clean code on your side!
24β’956d ago
What you place in
this.somevladdyβ’956d ago
Vlad Frangu's Notion on Notion
Handling Interactions (not Application Commands) in Sapphire
For a long time, the demand for interaction handlers in Sapphire has grown exponentially with time! The good news is that I finally have something to show you, and I think this will allow for some super clean code on your side!
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
you put a visibility on the constructor too?vladdyβ’956d ago
eslint rule 
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
huh!
vladdyβ’956d ago
you can have private constructors you know
ANYWAYS
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
Ah true
nodejs
ok
very fair then
ty π
vladdyβ’956d ago
hope it helps
24β’956d ago
ok all my questions are answered.
Lily Wonhalfβ’956d ago
same
vladdyβ’956d ago
Maybeβ’οΈ
24β’956d ago
ok so
we have it
1 down, 4 to go
vladdyβ’956d ago
4??
24β’956d ago
yeah I got one already
vladdyβ’956d ago
wait what
confused
24β’956d ago
thanos reference
vladdyβ’956d ago
AH
24β’956d ago
vladdyβ’956d ago
the answer is sadly no, you'll have to manually specify the type in the run function, just like you have to do in commands with the args class24β’956d ago
I accept that responsibility.
Thank you.
ThatGuyJamalβ’956d ago
looks interesting
vladdyβ’956d ago
I deadass wrote 992 words for this
Wow
Unknown Userβ’956d ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
vladdyβ’956d ago
well ok i'm the demand for nicer button handlers
Unknown Userβ’956d ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Lioness100β’956d ago
Yeah honestly, I know that they can mean different things, but I can't help my brain from wanting
interactions over interaction-handlers (and also tasks over scheduled-tasks)
It just looks so much cleanervladdyβ’955d ago
In this case, interactions are what you receive, and you need a handler for it. I know it's a long name, you can blame the rest for it not being camelCase, but I doubt it'll change
πππππβ’955d ago
Can we enforce the type of the result pass in
this.some?
It's fun to type it in run but as long as this.some is not typed, the type in run has little usecase as this.some could still pass something very different
also @vladdy I am working right now, I wouldn't dissapoint you not doing this while workingvladdyβ’954d ago
Even if I made it a generic on the class level it wouldn't help. This is why our event classes don't infer the types received in the run method when you set the event in the class generic. If we'd make the run method a class field..that might work but that's not something I'm gonna do
So it's up to the user to type their things right, and if they're using typescript that won't be hard
And js users just don't have to bother with this π
πππ up to you
HOWEVER
I might be able to make a utility in the namespace
@.yugen.i have a present for you
let me just document it in notion
πππππβ’954d ago
I know
I read it
in #old-coding-den
And I love you for it
vladdyβ’954d ago
Added the changelog: https://www.notion.so/vladfrangu/Handling-Interactions-not-Application-Commands-in-Sapphire-92e307005b9f4e3b849663ea43c57701#68d96ce3554841cdb94a63da75a0793f
CC @lilywonhalf since you're a TS nerd
Vlad Frangu's Notion on Notion
Handling Interactions (not Application Commands) in Sapphire
For a long time, the demand for interaction handlers in Sapphire has grown exponentially with time! The good news is that I finally have something to show you, and I think this will allow for some super clean code on your side!
vladdyβ’954d ago
You asked, I provided
Because I agree it's nice to 
πππππβ’954d ago
If only that always worked
when can we get helper functions like
addButton(message, 'Yes!', { style })
πΌ
I might actually make a dj.s utility for that if it doesn't exist yet <a:aPES_Think:493353113332219924>vladdyβ’954d ago
Unless message is a builder, never
especially not with that crime of an interface
πππππβ’954d ago
idk was just spouting nonsense
24β’954d ago
Swag.
Lily Wonhalfβ’954d ago
Niiiiiiiice π
Thank you!
Welcome to the Sapphire Discord server! The next-gen object-oriented Discord.js bot framework can be found here.
2.2KMembers
View on DiscordWant results from more Discord servers?
More PostsInitial Commit ThoughtsI've pushed the initial commit for interaction handlers: heavily wip, totally untested and raw (justThe statefulness or statelessness of Interactions1. Most likely, but it would be a nice addition if I was able to have non-state "callbacks" as mentiInteraction handlers in the command instead of globallyHonestly. I would much rather add interactions from my command and from there tell to continue in (fReply sess 2**1.** Yes. This also follows the design pattern that we more-or-less employ already for Sapphire. Wdont feel like creating a review on GitHub...PR is up: https://github.com/sapphiredev/utilities/pull/152
CC @kyra π©΅π©·π€π©·π©΅ @vladdy