Package jam judge signup thread

Package jam judge signup thread (free league points inside)
If you sign up as a package jam judge (anyone who did not submit an entry is eligible), you will get at least one, juicy, sumptuous :vote:
(League points are redeemable for cookies at a rate of ~400:1 cookie, must go to Ohio to redeem, subject to pointflation)
UUUnknown User9/21/2022
3 Messages Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
no code!
UUUnknown User9/21/2022
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I'm not sure if we've scraped the package list for the package jam flag yet. @jdw will have more info on that
UUUnknown User9/21/2022
2 Messages Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Some Specifics On Judging
Judges will need to have access to a v10 instance, and will need to install all of the packages submitted to the jam, along with any dependencies/systems they require. You will then evaluate each package:

- Can the package be enabled / does it work?
- Do the primary features of the package function?
- Which categires does the package qualify for?

Then we will fill out the nominations for each category. Each category has a limited number of slots, so this is the part where you are subjectively judging - which modules in category X are good enough/X enough to be part of that final selection.

After all that, those categories and nominations will be made public. At that point you and anyone else with a Foundry Hub account will be able to vote on them for the final winners.

The main expectations for judges that sets you apart from the average users: You will actually attempt to install and test all the packages that were submitted, and fairly evaluate them even if they aren't a module you would/could use in your own games. Your job will be to judge packages on their merits, and to render this judgment on all of them.
@kakaroto or @jdw could one of you try to query up the jam flag so we have a count of submissions?
quick DB query says there's 23 packages
UUUnknown User9/27/2022
5 Messages Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
We just set up the judges with the form, so I think we can squeeze you in
After this, no more!

Looking for more? Join the community!

Recommended Posts
git filter troubleshootingI'm troubleshooting a new setup that my code contributors can benefit from. I'm using a .gitconfig fmultiroll damage roll messagesMessing with multiroll chat message in v10❓About Commissions**Do not post commissions in this thread.** This thread is for discussing the commissions process, gIssue Submission ToolI'm looking for suggestions for free ticket submission without signing into GitHub that go beyond BuMM+, manifest+, attributions, and moreWe can make a thread to keep the MM+ discussion seperate if you'd likeGlitterSuppose someone wanted to make a module which created a stylistic ~~defect~~ enhancement that never Rolling Hooks**Rolling Hooks!** I am working on a couple of additions to one of the upcoming version of 5e to addWeight MRSure.2.0.0 explorationFrom Atropos in the mothership (in v10 Feedback) > Hello folks, for those of you testing V10 using tElectron ViteIt loads at least.early v10 compat testing@dnd5e - No action required Work is being done on fixing the core system compatibility with v10 in module.json helpYou have no manifest or download fields.TyphonJS Runtime Library - RC 0.0.12The TyphonJS Runtime Library / TRL release candidate version 0.0.12 is now available. This is a massCypress FunYeah, unfortunately it ain't that simple 😅 Cypress, like you say, automatically retries things, andpreUpdateHook questionHey all, question for anyone who has a sec. I'm trying to use `preCreateActor` to add rolled values spitballing about jest mocksok. ok. ok. pure spitballing theory here. All the client side source exists in esmodule form (hopef1.6.1 testing@dnd5e Testing Action Requested but not required. version 1.6.1 is a bugfix version, it's pretty clconversion macro@max.pat did you have a macro or script which could change the old classFeatures data into advancemeAC calc changesI do not believe the data for AC actually changed, only the way it is calculated. evidence: no chang1.6.0 Custom Sheet ChangesLooking at the changes made which are breaking for custom sheets. Gonna make a thread for this.