Deep Resonance

I have recently built my vcore 3.1 500 and I am having an issue with very pronounced ghosting on the X axis. Deep enough to feel. The Y axis is mostly fine. Tightening the belts past (what I think) is too tight does not fix it. And at this point loosening the belts does not impact it. I have just done a check and did not find any loose nuts or bolts. I do not believe the belt is rubbing against the printed parts. I do not yet have an ADXL345. I need to test lower accelerations. I thought I had limited it to 2000, but looking at the dashboard mid print, it does exceed that limit. It seems putting max_accel:2000 in my config did not actually limit it.
No description
No description
63 Replies
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
you can do the shaper calibration without a adxl345 https://www.klipper3d.org/Resonance_Compensation.html
Decker
Decker2y ago
You can, I did and forgot to note that. Manual resonance compensation did reduce nearly all the ghosting in the Y axis but not X currently in printer.cfg
[input_shaper]
shaper_freq_x: 110.571428571
shaper_freq_y: 101.25
shaper_type: mzv
[input_shaper]
shaper_freq_x: 110.571428571
shaper_freq_y: 101.25
shaper_type: mzv
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
this cant be right this is from my VC500 # Input shaper [input_shaper] shaper_type_x = zv shaper_freq_x = 67.2 shaper_type_y = zv shaper_freq_y = 38.2 also, your format is wrong shaper_type: mzv your frequencies are way too high
Decker
Decker2y ago
I could remove them and do another test print Ok, removing the input shaper lines does not change the results
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
bc you still dont have the right ones
Decker
Decker2y ago
Let me double check the math from the resonance test I definitely did the math wrong
xhz = 60 / (7/12.9) = 110.571428571
yhz = 60 / (8/13.5) = 101.25
xhz = 60 / (7/12.9) = 110.571428571
yhz = 60 / (8/13.5) = 101.25
Is incorrect. It should be
xhz = 60 * (7/12.9) = 32.5581395349
yhz = 60 * (8/13.5) = 35.5555555556
xhz = 60 * (7/12.9) = 32.5581395349
yhz = 60 * (8/13.5) = 35.5555555556
Thus, I should add this to my config
shaper_type_x = mzv
shaper_freq_x = 32.5581395349
shaper_type_y = mzv
shaper_freq_y = 35.5555555556
shaper_type_x = mzv
shaper_freq_x = 32.5581395349
shaper_type_y = mzv
shaper_freq_y = 35.5555555556
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
you dont need that much decimals 2 are enough
Decker
Decker2y ago
yeah, figured. that's just what I copied from the calculator
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
also, x should be around 65hz normaly y at arround 35 hz
Decker
Decker2y ago
I could try a manual 65hz I do plan on getting a adxl345 in the future
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
just buy one, 2 bucks buy a pack of 4 for 5 bucks, you will need them
Decker
Decker2y ago
It's the soldering I can't do yet "yet" because I do plan on it, but dont want learning soldiering to be the blocking element to getting passible prints
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
believe me, soldering pins is first day solder class, you can learn that in 10 minutes just try it, if you fail, try again, ...
Decker
Decker2y ago
Hm, good point But soldering for the adxl345 is like the first or second printer upgrade I plan on doing after it's "done" Or, upgrades I consider non essential
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
the adxl is the cheapest possible update, but it has the highest imapct on print quality just get some the printer is not complete without one
Decker
Decker2y ago
changing the input shper values to 32/35 and 65/35 did not change the ghosting
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
of course not, you need the values for your machine thae values i mentioned are typical values for you as a orientation
Decker
Decker2y ago
the 32/35 values were from the test I did with the corrected math
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
yes, but at elast the x vcalue cant be right again, typical value for x is around 65hz for y 35
Decker
Decker2y ago
Hm, so I was going to say if all 3 gave identical results... but in trying to take a good picture, it is more clear that the results are not identical. Thus I should re print the manual compensation test now Running the resonance compensation print again gives the x and y numbers of 33.95 and 33.86 but the results are not considerably better edit: tomorrow i will be purchasing a soldering iron and adxl345
compatible-crimson
compatible-crimson2y ago
@justdecker any luck?
Decker
Decker2y ago
Running the accelerometer tuning now Soldering was in fact considerably easier to learn than expected Results were as followed, running a short test print now
#*# [input_shaper]
#*# shaper_type_x = mzv
#*# shaper_freq_x = 63.6
#*# shaper_type_y = 2hump_ei
#*# shaper_freq_y = 51.6
#*# [input_shaper]
#*# shaper_type_x = mzv
#*# shaper_freq_x = 63.6
#*# shaper_type_y = 2hump_ei
#*# shaper_freq_y = 51.6
Decker
Decker2y ago
is this the information i was looking for
No description
Decker
Decker2y ago
Playing with belt tightness, I dont know what any of these mean and I cannot divine a correlation
No description
blacksmithforlife
They're just for making the two belts the same tightness by making their graphs match. Use the X and Y resonance tests to determine if they're tight or loose
Decker
Decker2y ago
the ones that look like this? (though these are both pre adjustment, from the same time as the 1st graph posted today)
No description
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
it looks already good, the green part is ok, thats how it should look, but before you continue you should try to get rid of the red part
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
before the red part isnt gone it doesnt make a lot of sense to start with the input shaper graphs
Decker
Decker2y ago
ok adjusted back to the starting point, except the colors swapped because I got the order wrong, how do i actually swash that peak? does it imply the relative tension is off?
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
the peak at 125hz means that something is vibrating like hell at this frequnecy it is mostly located at the eva toolhead somewhere or the yxy joiners the belts are already super equaly tensioned, thats good, you are almost there just that one resonance its what holding you back from having a great tuned input shaper
Decker
Decker2y ago
joiners?
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
the XY joiners are the two assemblies at both end of your gantry, its where the X and Y axis are joined, thats why we call them XY joiners
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
No description
Decker
Decker2y ago
got it, I'll check those for loose parts and then run the test again
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
also check for forgotten micro shims
Decker
Decker2y ago
it couldn't be the bridging artifacts, could it?
Decker
Decker2y ago
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
thats not ideal, but i doubt thats the issue here i bet something on the toolhead please share a photo your your toolhead setup
Decker
Decker2y ago
Yeah, I didn't find any "loose" nuts but a few that had room to be tightened
No description
No description
Decker
Decker2y ago
I can also zoom in or focus on specific sections or angles if you'd prefer
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
first suggestion is to finish your cable management first make sure the cables cant move
Decker
Decker2y ago
so that is one thing I was wondering, should I expect the adxl345 to be always on the toolhead? or just for the calibration
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
this isnt important, thats up to you, but with cable management i mean all the other cables probe, hotend, thermistor, .....
Decker
Decker2y ago
Alright, that is one aspect I"ve been struggling with
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
the toolhead has multiple zip tie pockets, use them
Decker
Decker2y ago
oh is that what those smaller holes are for
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
you have them on both sides
Decker
Decker2y ago
I do not know how to get these wires any tighter
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
something is vibrating, try to track it down by only measuring the affected frequency try TEST_RESONANCES FREQ_START=100 FREQ_END=150 its faster and you can probably hear from where its coming
Decker
Decker2y ago
it's the 4028 fan
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
screws not tight or what? running multiple 4028s without that issue
Decker
Decker2y ago
thats my assumption but I cant get the screws tight enough to stop the sound. but the sound does stop when I totally remove it and hold the fan alone (except the wire)
Decker
Decker2y ago
Yeah if I hold the fan with wires slack the whole time
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
if the fan can move then a screw is not tight
Decker
Decker2y ago
this is with all the screws removed Or, the fan is as removed as it can be without removing it from the wire loom for this test
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
test if your fan shourd is tightned the big one in the back from the toolhead, where the 4028 sits on
Decker
Decker2y ago
The shroud is on as tight as I can make it the buzzing appears as soon as the fan is connected with more than 1 screw I dont think this is fixable with current equipment. I either live with the resonance and maybe a new version of the fan shroud will fix it, or I remove the fan entirely e: unless I can print a spacer out of TPU?
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
the design if the shroud is totally ok also tpu spacers wont fix anything something is vibrating on the printer, i know its difficult to find, but its possible it takes some time
Decker
Decker2y ago
I believe that the design is fine, but because the sound stops when I isolate just the fan makes me think it is something about either the fan or the interface of the fan to the shroud It could be my specific shroud wait
Decker
Decker2y ago
why now edit: this is the fan attached, running the test as normal
No description
Helge Keck
Helge Keck2y ago
you removed the fan anbd reattahced it, right? then you have probably tightend the screws better then before
Decker
Decker2y ago
I must have. And I did try pulling the nuts a little closer. I do still hear the buzz at those frequencies but I guess that's not the actual problem, just a potential symptom But also: thank you for putting up with me being wrong and eating my words all day
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server