Theo's Typesafe Cult•12mo ago

Utility type to "undiscriminate" a discriminated union

So this might be kind of a hacky thing, but I've got a use case that could greatly benefit from it. Basically, imagine I have the following type:

type DiscriminatedUnion = {
  type: "image"
  imageUrl: string
} | {
  type: "text"
  body: string
}

type DiscriminatedUnion = {
  type: "image"
  imageUrl: string
} | {
  type: "text"
  body: string
}

I've been trying to make a utility type essentially flatten this type into something like this:

type FlattenDiscriminatedUnion<Union, Field extends string> = {
  // ?????
}

// FlattenDiscriminatedUnion<DiscriminatedUnion, "type"> === {
//   type: "image" | "text"
//   imageUrl?: string
//   body?: string
//}

type FlattenDiscriminatedUnion<Union, Field extends string> = {
  // ?????
}

// FlattenDiscriminatedUnion<DiscriminatedUnion, "type"> === {
//   type: "image" | "text"
//   imageUrl?: string
//   body?: string
//}

This may be pushing the limits of TS, but was hoping some wizardry could be done to solve this. Does this sound like something that's even possible? I've been trying to make it happen for a while but can't seem to get it to work.

1 Reply

Matvey•12mo ago

https://dev.to/lucianbc/union-type-merging-in-typescript-9al

DEV Community

Union Type Merging in Typescript

Typescript unions can be very useful in a lot of cases. They can be used to implement algebraic data...

Gaming

Programming

Utility type to "undiscriminate" a discriminated union