11 replies

Yeah had a few problems with the smart

Yeah had a few problems with the smart pointers a while ago as well. But I'll give it another go. My problem right now though is that I can't call self from within the event handler.

radix•10/24/23, 6:29 PM

is "self" here the actual durable object?

SamOP•10/24/23, 6:30 PM

Yup.

SamOP•10/24/23, 6:31 PM

Here's the struct for self.

#[durable_object]
pub struct Server{
network: Network,
state: State,
env: Env,
}

radix•10/24/23, 6:32 PM

ok, so what I ended up doing is basically keeping my equivalent of Network wrapped in Rc<RefCell<Network>>, and then passing a clone of that into my event handler

radix•10/24/23, 6:33 PM

you can see my code here: https://github.com/radix/arpeggiorpg/blob/main/worker/src/durablegame.rs

GitHub

arpeggiorpg/worker/src/durablegame.rs at main · radix/arpeggiorpg

A tabletop role-playing game system. Contribute to radix/arpeggiorpg development by creating an account on GitHub.

radix•10/24/23, 6:33 PM

(there's still a lot I need to do on how I maintain the websockets -- I'm not yet cleaning them up when they disconnect, but the general idea is there & works)

radix•10/24/23, 6:34 PM

I created a separate struct in "wsrpi.rs" that is responsible for handling a single connection, and it has a clone of that Rc<RefCell<Network>>, and that's where my "broadcast" method lives: https://github.com/radix/arpeggiorpg/blob/main/worker/src/wsrpi.rs#L269

GitHub

arpeggiorpg/worker/src/wsrpi.rs at main · radix/arpeggiorpg

A tabletop role-playing game system. Contribute to radix/arpeggiorpg development by creating an account on GitHub.

Rradix ok, so what I ended up doing is basically keeping my equivalent of Network wrapp...

SamOP•10/24/23, 6:54 PM

Genius. Looking into it right now! Thanks.

SamOP•10/25/23, 12:30 PM

@radix I'm finding that

Response::from_websocket(client)

Response::from_websocket(client)

for some reason evokes this panic"called Result::unwrap()Result::unwrap() on an ErrErr value: JsValue(RangeError: Responses may only be constructed with status codes in the range 200 to 599, inclusive."

Any clue as to why?

SamOP•10/25/23, 12:32 PM

I mean I get that it returns a 101 that's what it's supposed to return for websockets right?

SamOP•10/25/23, 1:48 PM

Nevermind it works. Was a version issue.

radix•10/25/23, 2:37 PM

oh, interesting. I was going to say, that sounds really strange

glad you got it working.

Yeah had a few problems with the smart

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads