Vivaldi official flatpak networking
If you know more about it than I do, which is a very low bar, I would appreciate if you can post about that on the forum thread. It looked like the Vivaldi team just isn't very familiar with Flatpak or how to judge whether Zypak can be trusted to be secure and keep working. I posted this in the Fedora server, feel free to pass it on if you know anyone:
"
I found this today, about why Vivaldi does not have an official Flatpak yet:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/post/669805
I did two things about it:
https://github.com/refi64/zypak/issues/38#issue-1977606507
https://forum.vivaldi.net/post/708172
Could we get as many upvotes / contributions to these as possible? If anyone knows how to address this sandboxing/security blocker, or can just show community support, it would be appreciated. I personally use Vivaldi, I have seen many people who want it as a Flatpak, and I think it would be good to have at least one truly official Chromium-based browser Flatpak.
"
"
I found this today, about why Vivaldi does not have an official Flatpak yet:
https://forum.vivaldi.net/post/669805
I did two things about it:
https://github.com/refi64/zypak/issues/38#issue-1977606507
https://forum.vivaldi.net/post/708172
Could we get as many upvotes / contributions to these as possible? If anyone knows how to address this sandboxing/security blocker, or can just show community support, it would be appreciated. I personally use Vivaldi, I have seen many people who want it as a Flatpak, and I think it would be good to have at least one truly official Chromium-based browser Flatpak.
"
