toolbox/distrobox rhel
that part i think needs some more thinking, are we talking about using the toolbox command instead or running the toolbox image inside distrobox like we do now?
toolbox the binary, they don't use distrobox at all. So the idea was "if you're using rhel then let's give it to them the way redhat wants it"ujust toolbox- here we comeDistrobox function)distrobox-FOO recipes and replaced with a single distrobox which takes an arg/choice, right?toolbox in addition to distrobox may be finetoolbox- recipe with its own toolingtoolbox and distrobox at the same time for containers? if so i can write in a check for thatdistrobox- could say "Create a toolbox container (using uBlue recommend distrobox)" and toolbox docstring could say "Alternative way to create toolbox containers" ujust toolbox-Distroboxdistrobox-FOOtoolbox-distrobox-