12 Replies
is this right or not
To me, it looks correct
as always, @𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐉𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐡, https://tryitands.ee
actually
thanks
It is "correct" if you want to connect using "
play.totemmc.fun".
If you want people to be able to connect using "totemmc.fun" alone, then remove the ending ".play" from the name, so it's just "_minecraft._tcp"
However, since the SRV record's target is "play.totemmc.fun", having a SRV record for the "play" (_minecraft._tcp.PLAY) label as you show, is somewhat redundant - and not necessary / useless.thanks @DarkDeviL
not entirely
it makes it so that people connecting don't have to put the port
without the srv, it'll probably go to some rando's server on that (likely shared) ip
Thanks! Somehow I may have misread the different port up there!
Most often, I see people adding the SRV even when they're running with the default port - which, as mentioned above, would be redundant / not necessary / useless when using the default port.
yeah
@𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐉𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐡 Not sure if you're still looking, - but to clear it up from above:
Since you are actually using a non-default port (e.g. 49015 instead of 25565), you might actually want to have the SRV record as mentioned above.
If you are looking to be able to connect using BOTH the two names, "
totemmc.fun" and "play.totemmc.fun", then you would like to add two almost identical SRV records.
One with the name "_minecraft._tcp" and one with the name "_minecraft._tcp.play", but with the same contents.ook