Integrating Effect with Traditional ADTs in AST Traversal: Seeking Best Practices

Hello Effect folks.

I'm implementing an AST traversal with quite a bit of recursive

Match

Match

ing, and the original solution used

Option

Option

and

Either

Either

almost exclusively. Now that I'd like to add debug logging and maybe context in the future, I've introduced

Effect

Effect

, but that's becoming unwieldy when mixed with the more traditional ADTs.

Would it be an abuse to use

Effect

Effect

over

and

for everything? I'm not sure where or how to delineate usage in general.

Coming from a strong TS and weak Haskell background and loving
effect
effect
so far after being a recent
fp-ts
fp-ts
user!

Effect Community•2y ago

ehegnes

Integrating Effect with Traditional ADTs in AST Traversal: Seeking Best Practices

Hello Effect folks.

I'm implementing an AST traversal with quite a bit of recursive

Match

Match

ing, and the original solution used

Option

Option

and

Either

Either

almost exclusively. Now that I'd like to add debug logging and maybe context in the future, I've introduced

Effect

Effect

, but that's becoming unwieldy when mixed with the more traditional ADTs.

Would it be an abuse to use

Effect

Effect

over

and

Integrating Effect with Traditional ADTs in AST Traversal: Seeking Best Practices

Similar Threads

Integrating Effect with Traditional ADTs in AST Traversal: Seeking Best Practices

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads