How big are your uploads? Are you trying to use a single PutObject operation or a multipart operatio
How big are your uploads? Are you trying to use a single PutObject operation or a multipart operation?
SDo you see any errors? Maybe turn the verbosity up and see if you can find logs that may indicate what’s going on
Dnothing. I don't know where are the logs.
DThe Class A Operations a Class B Operations are increasing very slow but no files are synced. Now im tryng a migration first to populate R2
BHi, I tried to invalidate an R2 object (.js) cache via executing a worker that fetches it (the object URL). It's weird because the worker always returns the latest version, but that object URL continues to give older versions when executed outside the worker
BSo my question is: Am I supposed to use always the worker URL (instead the object URL) to make it work?
I thought that fetching it just one time from the worker would be enough
I thought that fetching it just one time from the worker would be enough
Jhey guys qq does anyone know if failed operations are counted towards the requests per month for R2? Requests to my public r2 domain that result in 404
Jok how i can update the r2 public links to not cache failed responses? right now that seems to be the case even tho r2 has the response after a while it still serving the 404
Show to create a worker, which resize the image before inserting into R2?
CHey guys. We have over 3M files that we needed to push to R2 and use as rclone mount. However we were not able to because versining was not enabled. Just wanted to give my feedback on this. Loved the product but cant really use it becaue of this.
Ohow can i force refresh of a file? i even deleted it but seems like the cache still serves the file
RHey i have connected custom domain with r2
R2 seems slower than s3 . Is there any obvious mistakes i am making?
R2 seems slower than s3 . Is there any obvious mistakes i am making?
Sis anyone aware of an issue with connection timeouts with R2 since about April? I'm currently using R2 behind cdn.liquorix.net, and I may have to discontinue due to reoccurring timeouts being reported by users after updating objects
S@Rishabh Jalan R2 should be faster, from what I understand it's globally distributed, as in it should perform like CloudFront + S3 automatically
Rs3 vs r2 in putting string 'helloworld' r2 put takes upward of 1.5 seconds where as s3 put takes around 0.2 seconds
get request r2 takes upward of 0.5 seconds , s3 takes around 0.05
get request r2 takes upward of 0.5 seconds , s3 takes around 0.05
RI shifted under the same assumption but its a lot different
Sthat is concerning, but I think R2 is optimized for thoughput, not latency, like large media assets
Rhow to optimise this latency ? any idea ?
Smaybe something changed though, like I mentioned, R2 was doing great for about 2 months, but since beginning of April it's been nothing but problems
Rhmm , i may need to go back if its this slow . its like 10x slower
CIt's not distributed at all except for cache/the fact you could manually make buckets in a bunch of regions. Under your r2 bucket settings you can see the location of your bucket. All your objects stay in that region, only caching would let you distribute them globally
Rmy r2 bucket is in apac region and i am calling it from apac only still very slow
Zapac is known to be unstable
RCan anyone check and let me know what is the latency ?
Rdropping the python script
s3vsr2speedtest.py1.41KB
R@Space - Ping in replies thank you so much . its better than apac but still not as good as s3
Rhas the quality deteriorated recently ?
Ris there any other alternative ? else i have to go back to aws s3
Rlet me check out buffer writes . never heard about it
Ri am using aws lambda to edit some images . any idea on how i can buffer writes ?
Rhow is workers latency in apac ?
Rthat i know but how do they perform vis aws lambda
Ris queues similar to sqs?
Rsqs is simple queue service from aws
Rsounds like a lot of work to move from aws lambda to workers .
Rlambda bill is around 10 dollars only as of now
Ri will move when this increases right now s3 has started reaching 40
Rso moving from that
Rhmm ?
R40 includes egress
Ri am expecting it to rise slowly so taking appropriate actions
Rthanks for your help @Space - Ping in replies
Rthats correct but egress later is cheaper
Rshould balance it out
S@Space - Ping in replies when I mentioned earlier about R2 being globally distributed, I was wrong as you mentioned, but if you proxy it as a public bucket, it sits behind cloudflare's caching capabilities
Sthat's my use case at least, I don't really see why you wouldn't do that if R2 is meant for public assets
Smy current bucket is behind ENAM (eastern north america), I'm gonna try WNAM and see if things improve
Soh interesting, that's good to know
Syou're right, the cache proxying may actually be the problem
Sya, that's what attracted R2 to me, they seem to be a great choice if you're hosting a package repository with lots of read traffic