Hello, just dropping my feedback that it would be fantastic to see a new feature on Workers to bind

Hello, just dropping my feedback that it would be fantastic to see a new feature on Workers to bind to cloudflared tunnels such that we could issue fetch requests to them without needing to publicly publish a CNAME in DNS. I've tried just about everything I can think of and still get

Error 1102 DNS points to local or disallowed IPv6 address

Error 1102 DNS points to local or disallowed IPv6 address

Error 1102 DNS points to local or disallowed IPv6 address

Error 1102 DNS points to local or disallowed IPv6 address

IIsaac McFadyen Yup, through the metadata binding: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/run...

aarhus•9/11/24, 9:40 PM

Thank you! I missed the release of this

RaccoonHands•9/11/24, 9:52 PM

Hello, I'm first time CF developer and the person who set up workers on the backend of my app set a few variables in the wrangler.toml file which I changed to my own CF setup. I'm confused about the api app secret environment variable they set though, where can I get access to that thru my own CF account?

RRaccoonHands Hello, I'm first time CF developer and the person who set up workers on the back...

Ashley•9/11/24, 10:04 PM

You can either set them under the worker in your account, under its settings - make sure you encrypt it so A) it’s secure and B) it’s retained between deployments. Alternatively, you can use Wrangler: https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/wrangler/commands/#secret

Cloudflare Docs

Commands | Cloudflare Workers docs

Create, develop, and deploy your Cloudflare Workers with Wrangler commands.

Abdallah Abis•9/11/24, 10:08 PM

Hey folks,
I'm trying to test my worker using vitestvitest as I want to test CF APIs like HTMLRewriterHTMLRewriter
I'm also using mswmsw to mock fetch requests
I'm also using the @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers package, because without it I'm getting HTMLRewriter is not definedHTMLRewriter is not defined
But with @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers used, I'm getting
Error: No known conditions for "./node" specifier in "msw" packageError: No known conditions for "./node" specifier in "msw" package

AAshley You can either set them under the worker in your account, under its settings - m...

RaccoonHands•9/11/24, 10:53 PM

thanks

travis•9/12/24, 10:43 AM

hi there! I see that the Rate Limiting API has been deprecated (https://developers.cloudflare.com/waf/reference/migration-guides/old-rate-limiting-deprecation/) - does that mean the worker binding described here will also stop working next January? https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/runtime-apis/bindings/rate-limit/

Cloudflare Docs

Rate limiting (previous version) deprecation | Cloudflare Web Appli...

Guide on the deprecation of rate limiting rules (previous version) and how to migrate to the new version.

Cloudflare Docs

Rate Limiting | Cloudflare Workers docs

Define rate limits and interact with them directly from your Cloudflare Worker

Ttravis hi there! I see that the Rate Limiting API has been deprecated (https://develope...

Isaac McFadyen•9/12/24, 12:10 PM

No. The old Rate Limiting rules don't relate to the Workers bindings, and the Workers bindings aren't being deprecated, you're good

travis•9/12/24, 1:59 PM

phew, thank you!

thelovekesh•9/12/24, 4:55 PM

Is there a way to include static content with my Worker build and use it within the Worker, similar to the Pages env.ASSETS.fetch()env.ASSETS.fetch() API? I don't want to include some html content in my worker build.

fake hecker•9/12/24, 6:06 PM

how are workers supposed to work when there's no require

fake hecker•9/12/24, 6:06 PM

but there is a package.json for some reason

Ffake hecker how are workers supposed to work when there's no require

Phaze•9/12/24, 6:08 PM

cloudflare workers don't use the requirerequire statement, it uses the importimport statement

const mymodule = require('mymodule') // Not This
import { mymodule } from 'mymodule'; // <<< This

const mymodule = require('mymodule') // Not This
import { mymodule } from 'mymodule'; // <<< This

fake hecker•9/12/24, 6:14 PM

Vveikkoeeva I hope there will be docs then how to do things with Pages. I want at first inst...

Wallacy•9/12/24, 10:48 PM

You can just fetch assets from env.ASSETS.fetch(); Just use the "advance more", and pages will be like Worker Sites: https://developers.cloudflare.com/pages/functions/advanced-mode/

Cloudflare Docs

Advanced mode | Cloudflare Pages docs

Advanced mode allows you to develop your Pages Functions with a _worker.js file rather than the /functions directory.

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:48 PM

Is there a way in a cloudflare worker to not reintercept a call, so let's say we intercept test.com/123 and then actually want to navigate to test.com/123?

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:48 PM

You will just pass the request on

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:48 PM

if you fetch() test.com/123 it won't re-invoke your Worker

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:49 PM

export default {
  fetch(req) {
    const newReq = new Request(req);

    newReq.headers.append('Test', '1234');

    return fetch(newReq);
  }
}

export default {
  fetch(req) {
    const newReq = new Request(req);

    newReq.headers.append('Test', '1234');

    return fetch(newReq);
  }
}

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:50 PM

will add the header "Test: 1234" and continue to the origin

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:58 PM

i don't think we really explicitly state it on the docs but yeah, we don't re-invoke

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:58 PM

it'd cause most people to have infinite loops if we did

Walshy•9/12/24, 11:58 PM

it's very common to just passthrough

Walshy•9/13/24, 12:07 AM

More clear to re-invoke?

Walshy•9/13/24, 12:09 AM

If you mean why isn't it doc'd, I recommend making an issue

https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/issues

marko.333•9/13/24, 3:01 AM

Is it possible for an RPC Stub to be persisted in Durable Object Storage, then later retrieved from storage and invoked? Thx.

Avi•9/13/24, 5:47 AM

where can i read more about workers new “assets” features?

Avi•9/13/24, 5:47 AM

i’ve seen it mentioned in a number of recent changelogs

Mmarko.333 Is it possible for an RPC Stub to be persisted in Durable Object Storage, then l...

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:08 AM

It is not

Oom Hey, i wanted is the workers cpu time limit per script and also what happens if ...

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:11 AM

What are you running that needs await?

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:11 AM

Workers should auto-abort anything you don’t await

Oom Streaming llm response

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:12 AM

Where are you streaming it to?

Oom Client browser

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:12 AM

If it is a Response being returned, then that doesn’t need to be awaited?

Oom It's also calling tools, which might take a bit of time, in loops.

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:15 AM

After returning a Response?

Oom It will call tools that time, i want to stream the progress that it has called t...

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:17 AM

Then wrap the whole thing in a

ctx.waitUntil

ctx.waitUntil

Oom But it's limited to 30s then 💀, what if the functions I am running might take a...

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:21 AM

30 CPU Seconds

Hello, I’m Allie!•9/13/24, 7:21 AM

Not Real-Time

Hello, just dropping my feedback that it would be fantastic to see a new feature on Workers to bind

Similar Threads