thermal conduction

No description
45 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
wow interesting I = -KAdt/dx but dt isn't constant I will be dq/dt im not getting the equations
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Yum. I started doing it and got a second order DE Got general solution for one side. Need to solve for other side, input conditions
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
Im getting three d wale terms dT/dx in the RHS dq/dt in the LHS
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Let me try from the beginning actually
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
can't find how to relate all these
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Wait you took dT/dx into consideration? The rod has negligible heat capacity so I assumed its temperature can be ignored. Huh Yeah, then I messed up
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
the source and sink are at different temperatures so the heat flow should be through the rod as well
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Yup tup *yup Crap I did all of this wrong
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
😭
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Got this and all
No description
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Curve which like charging capacitor in RC circuit for comparison. Which makes sense.
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
time and temperature ko leke differential format banana hai but idk what to with the dx
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Since it should asymptote
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
interesting i see
Opt
Opt2mo ago
$Sa$ is $m{a}s_{a}$
TeXit
TeXit2mo ago
Opt
No description
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
yeah It does it'll attain a steady state when T1 = T2
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Ta = Tb. T1 and T2 are initial values I didn't want to get confused
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
oh haan yesyes I can't get the equations to work
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Wait, won't that temp be (T1+T2)/2 ?
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
why so?
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Just checking. Nvm it depends on initial difference
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
i see
Opt
Opt2mo ago
IT ALL HECKING COLLAPSED PRACTICALLY EVERYTHING CANCELLED Final answer I got was exponential decay $\delta T(t) = (T_2 - T1)e^{-\frac{KA(m{1}s{1}+m{2}s{2})}{m{1}s{1}m{2}s_{2}l}t}$
TeXit
TeXit2mo ago
Opt
No description
Opt
Opt2mo ago
All conditions are satisfied Afaik @hardcoreisdead pls confirm Because I didn't take temp.grad. into consideration @Dexter see if you got the same result
hithav
hithav2mo ago
No description
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
ah ok dT = dQ/ms😞 😞
flower
flower2mo ago
Newton's law of cooling
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
no Its conduction that was radiation
flower
flower2mo ago
Ohhhhh right
hithav
hithav2mo ago
yeah it's not intuitive i had solved a similar ques before so it was all bit easier :sweaty:
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
idk man im not able to solve good questions aajkal quality has Deteriorated alot
hithav
hithav2mo ago
4 more days left after that you will get back your form ,even I don't get new kinds of ques i end up seeing soln after 10-15 mins
Dexter
Dexter2mo ago
idfk if I'll be able to crack good questions anymore man Feeling very demotivated nowadays
Opt
Opt2mo ago
You did the simple thing 🤦‍♂️ I did Ta, Tb individually and subtracted lmao
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2mo ago
Exact answer
No description
Opt
Opt2mo ago
Yup, same thing. I just took LCM
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2mo ago
Your T2-T1 implies T20-T10 or inverse of that Explain the logic of this ques pls
Opt
Opt2mo ago
There's a mod involved because of the integration
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2mo ago
+solved @Opt
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1741519026:R>
Solved by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)

Did you find this page helpful?