25 Replies
@Dexter
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.lmao this is exactly why i forgot to solve it in time
i kept it for later
you dont approximate it, you rawdog the calculations
thats the problem with PC numericals
changing 5.75 to 5.8 gives you 945
i dont know what other approximation you'd think of that'd actually simply your calculations and give you the correct answer
this gonna rawdog my score then 🔥
everyone despises PC numericals its fine ðŸ˜
nah i like PC
PC numericals*
but this is smthing else
sm diff shit
brainrot
systemic problem
peak brainrot fr
i was doing chem kinetics and got 4 pyqs wrong solely because of calc
they test you being a calculator in such koschens??
legit req ans se 1 kam
sadly yes
L exam
nahi dena
L
sadly dena toh padega
trust me bro in physical chem numericals
do not approximate
if you're gonna approximate
think thrice
how much the approximation will have an effect on your answer
eg. here they've asked into 10^-2 so any approximation will change your answer
if they've asked with less precision and the numbers you get wont have a large impact, and your approximations are small enough and the terms you're approximating aren't squared or something, then maybe you'll get correct answer
its an art
better is to just not do it
art school rejected me
time to rise
heil-
-hitler
:D
in 10^-3 too i got wrong
im literally the worst mod
890 smthing
10^-3 is more precise
they're asking you for more decimal points
yeahh
kash sari calc aisi hoti
this pretty much the same question i posted but so much better calc
+solved @Nimboi
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1743323205:R>
Solved by
<@717724055217635398> (717724055217635398)