You just make a service binding which references the same worker

11984 Ford Laser You just make a service binding which references the same worker

Tero•4/14/25, 8:38 AM

Yeah that is what I tried to do, but I did not get it to work. When wrangler starts up locally it shows that binding as disconnected, and when I try to call it, the call also fails. I did not find any explicit mentions from the documentation if this should be possible or not, so if someone has a working example I am curious to hear / see about that one.

TTero Yeah that is what I tried to do, but I did not get it to work. When wrangler sta...

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/14/25, 8:40 AM

Sorry I dont have much experience with testing locally, what command are you running?

11984 Ford Laser Sorry I dont have much experience with testing locally, what command are you run...

Tero•4/14/25, 8:52 AM

In local env I run it with wrangler dev --env dev wrangler dev --env dev and all other bindings (durable objects, other workers, queues) work as expected.

And in my wrangler.toml I tried to have

[[env.dev.services]]
binding = "MY-BINDING"
service = "my-worker-name-dev"

[[env.dev.services]]
binding = "MY-BINDING"
service = "my-worker-name-dev"

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/14/25, 10:15 AM

Does adding --remote help at all?

Tero•4/14/25, 11:31 AM

I also use CF Queues in my setup and they don't support --remote, so not too keen to start exploring that option... https://developers.cloudflare.com/queues/configuration/local-development/#known-issues

thelunz•4/14/25, 6:07 PM

Our DO now has an in-memory wakeupTypewakeupType property, that we start as the empty string. The possible reasons for a wakeup are (1) a fetch, (2) a websocket message, or (3) an alarm. Each of these comes through a single entry point (whereas allowing incoming RPC calls muddies that, so we've put those back to being fetches). When any of those points is hit while the wakeupTypewakeupType is still empty we set the type accordingly, and that determines how we handle log output for the rest of that wakeup.

Tthelunz Our DO now has an in-memory `wakeupType` property, that we start as the empty st...

thelunz•4/14/25, 7:04 PM

sorry - this was meant to be a reply to @Danny above. Somehow I fumbled the reply connection.

Matthew•4/14/25, 9:44 PM

Hey, has anybody done any measurement/comparison between D1 and Hyperdrive performance wise? I'd like to migrate from D1 to Hyperdrive and would love to know more beforehand.
Thanks Xx

MMatthew Hey, has anybody done any measurement/comparison between D1 and Hyperdrive perfo...

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/14/25, 9:55 PM

I dont think theyre directly comparable products, especially as Hyperdrive performance could be affected by the origin DB. Might be better to ask in #d1-database or #hyperdrive

MMatthew Hey, has anybody done any measurement/comparison between D1 and Hyperdrive perfo...

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/14/25, 9:56 PM

?crossposting

SuperHelpflare•4/14/25, 9:56 PM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

TTyveris I have this exact same problem. My current solution has been to have the worker ...

Tero•4/15/25, 5:12 AM

I actually experimented with queues but realised they had another problem with a consumer delay that was too slow for my use case, tried to ask about that one here: queues

veeque•4/15/25, 8:59 AM

I am using Durable Objects to make a service for an app since my model allows me to instantiate a DO per user, this way I don't run into the 10GB limit a single D1 database would have. The only issue is that some power users will definitely exceed this limit and I'll have to shard the data across multiple instances.

When writing to the underlying SQL database I don't know how much space the inserted data will take up. I would like a way to:

start something like a transaction;
attempt to insert data;
if succeeded, return;
if failed (due to storage cap), rollback, and move to next shard.

I have the sharding figured out. I'm missing the rollback/transaction and knowing what error is thrown by DO. I know from reading somewhere that for D1 it's a D1_ERROR but even that is not documented.

I really would like not to have a "attempt to write, if it's 0.9GB move to another shard just in case" scenario.

Rocket Hosting•4/15/25, 9:20 AM

Need help All domain records gone but cloudflare is showing them
Any idea?

SuperHelpflare•4/15/25, 10:16 AM

Please do not post your question in multiple channels/post it multiple times per the rules at #

welcome-and-rules. It creates confusion for people trying to help you and doesn't get your issue or question solved any faster.

Vveeque I am using Durable Objects to make a service for an app since my model allows me...

lambrospetrou•4/15/25, 12:14 PM

You can use the transactionSync()transactionSync() https://developers.cloudflare.com/durable-objects/api/storage-api/#transactionsync if you want to control when the writes happen.
The error handling is not as clear cut though. You might need to handle the error in your worker calling the DO to make sure all exceptions are caught during that DO transaction. Using the above method guarantees that you won't have partial writes.

zehawk•4/15/25, 12:49 PM

I see that the worker websocket is closing the connection every roughly 4.5 mins. Whats the deal with this? I've not run across any documentation which has some information on some kind of timeout.

zehawk•4/15/25, 12:50 PM

And a test in Postman shows me the same

Vveeque I am using Durable Objects to make a service for an app since my model allows me...

gruntlord6•4/15/25, 3:57 PM

is there a specific type of data the power users are saving vs the other users?

Ggruntlord6 is there a specific type of data the power users are saving vs the other users?

veeque•4/15/25, 3:59 PM

no. same data, just more rows. when inserting a row I might also have to insert rows in a many-to-many table, but not all the time. that's why i'd need transactions

Vveeque no. same data, just more rows. when inserting a row I *might* also have to inser...

James•4/15/25, 4:21 PM

id investigate re-design if possible to shard out the high potential load by default, unless you really really need one table to potentially eat up 10gb on its own, there is a good chance you can treat all user accounts the same and shard out the high potential, or expire / purge old data you don't need in the OLTP store. Doing lookups and joins later with rows 1-x on one shard and 1,000,000-y on another will be problematic.

JJames id investigate re-design if possible to shard out the high potential load by def...

veeque•4/15/25, 4:26 PM

it's a ticketing platform. you create an event (i'll make a DO for each), and you can create tickets for each person attending (stored inside the DO). The problem is that I will need the following queries to execute rather quickly:

get all users (paginated) of each event.
get info about a specific ticket (they can have policies, so i'll want the ticket to return with the policies it follows)
find a ticket based on queries such as "holder's name"

policies are shared among other tickets too, so ticketstickets and policiespolicies have a many-to-many relation

i can handle joins since i could handle constrains myself given the (relative) simplicity of the data.

tl;dr: i can't really not store the data or make a DO per ticket, since looking into every single "ticket DO" would be excruciatingly slow

Vveeque it's a ticketing platform. you create an event (i'll make a DO for each), and yo...

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/15/25, 9:38 PM

One thing I do here is store a list of IDs in a 'parent' DO to be able to easily pull the required lists of tickets/instances where you need. This is one area where DOs aren't super optimised, I wish there was a way to have like a foreign key relationship that would automatically pull/push updates to related DO instances, almost as subrequests that are abstracted away by the runtime

11984 Ford Laser One thing I do here is store a list of IDs in a 'parent' DO to be able to easily...

veeque•4/15/25, 10:28 PM

I thought about doing that. The "main" worker, the one that handles the request that may need to operate on one—or more—DOs knows the name of the "consumed" DO to use (as you'd expect). Instead of making a parent DO to know all children I was planning on just making it so you, by default, use my-do-uuid/0my-do-uuid/0 for the first one. You would then run a stub.hasMoreShards()stub.hasMoreShards() and if that returns truetrue you'll move on to my-do-uuid/1my-do-uuid/1 and so on. I would have to set that flag myself, but it's not that difficult to do.

Reading my message again even I'm confused. In context:

The worker receives a request to find a particular ticket for a particular event. It does into the do with name event-uuid/0event-uuid/0. Finds nothing by running an SQL query. Sees that calling hasMoreShards()hasMoreShards() on that stub returns truetrue. Goes to event-uuid/1event-uuid/1 and does the same.

san•4/16/25, 1:58 AM

Is there a way to run AI generated code in a durable object?

Ssan Is there a way to run AI generated code in a durable object?

Hello, I’m Allie!•4/16/25, 3:16 AM

You would need to redeploy the Worker that hosts the Durable Object. Workers cannot execute code that wasn't present when they were uploaded

san•4/16/25, 3:22 AM

seems like a good feature to add for ai agents?

Rrh Is something like https://github.com/cloudflare/workers-rs also available for C+...

formatc2013•4/16/25, 8:36 AM

check this out
https://cpp.js.org/docs/guide/integrate-into-existing-project/cloudflare-worker

Cloudflare Worker | Cpp.js

You can use cpp.js to compile native code from your project into WebAssembly. To do this, add the build script and cpp.js as a dependency in the package.json file of your project.

veeque•4/16/25, 7:48 PM

https://developers.cloudflare.com/workers/platform/storage-options/ needs to be updated since kv DOs don't have a 50gb per account limit (with sql)

Hhannes No, this is an important security criteria.. Cloudflare needs to be able to chec...

san•4/17/25, 11:24 AM

does cloudflare check your code for attack vectors on deploy?

san•4/17/25, 11:29 AM

interesting. if they don't check then disabling dynamic code is useless if you can just deploy a worker from another worker. That said, an MCP server to deploy cloudflare stuff sounds neat

Ssan interesting. if they don't check then disabling dynamic code is useless if you c...

Larry•4/17/25, 11:34 AM

You have to have jumped through a bunch of hoops to code your system to be able to route user traffic to generated code so this is a case of being given enough rope to hang yourself but leaving it up to you to not tie it into a noose and stick your head in it.

Hhannes Part of their „security in depth“ approach is to be able to scan all scripts for...

Unsmart•4/17/25, 4:38 PM

Workers are part of the SOC2 scope: https://www.cloudflare.com/trust-hub/compliance-resources/soc-2/

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/18/25, 1:21 AM

Anyone designed a client/UI that maintains a dozen+ socket connections? I am planning to use partysocketpartysocket to listen for updates on a bunch of sockets but want to check if there are any implementation quirks I should be aware of

FiveGuys•4/18/25, 4:05 AM

Is there a way to get into the new Durable Object Containers alpha/beta?

FFiveGuys Is there a way to get into the new Durable Object Containers alpha/beta?

1984 Ford LaserOP•4/18/25, 6:47 AM

Wait until June

11984 Ford Laser Anyone designed a client/UI that maintains a dozen+ socket connections? I am pla...

Grant•4/18/25, 3:40 PM

Haven't tried many client sockets and not sure of limitations, but I believe at minimum each browser has its own limitations on sockets, either across all tabs or per-host. If that proves to be constraining you could possibly use one DO/socket that brokers messages from multiple other DOs via RPC to reduce client sockets to 1.

GGrant Haven't tried many client sockets and not sure of limitations, but I believe at ...

Larry•4/18/25, 7:28 PM

If you are connecting to a dozen different DOs, that should work, but I think there is a browser limit of 30 or so open total.

ddsgadget•4/19/25, 1:25 AM

Hi, we are trying use the Alarms API in durable objects. Our pseudo code is below. Our code works, but for some reason, the alarm will only fire once (in our case, 60 seconds after the Durable Object code is executed). After the first run of the alarm, the alarm does not fire again. I was under the impression that an Alarm will fire multiple times until it is deleted, very much like a cron. Is the intended activity to fire only once? If not, why does our Alarm only fire once? What is the code to make it like a cron, so it fire for example, every 60 seconds? From what I can tell an Alarm only fires once when the durable function is called? Is there a way to set an ongoing Alarm that continues to fire after the first one is set? async getReceipts(): Promise<any> {

let currentAlarm = await this.ctx.storage.getAlarm();
if (currentAlarm == null) {
this.ctx.storage.setAlarm(Date.now() + 1000 * SECONDS);
}

}
async alarm() {
console.log('We have fired the alarm for Check Receipts! Call the Workflow here!');
}

Dddsgadget Hi, we are trying use the Alarms API in durable objects. Our pseudo code is belo...

Khafra•4/19/25, 2:45 AM

Alarms have guaranteed at-least-once execution and are retried automatically when the alarm() handler throws.

You can setAlarm within the alarm handler to have it reschedule/run every 60 seconds

You just make a service binding which references the same worker

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads