I
iTeachChem•6d ago
Opt

Differential calculus? Honestly, idk.

Q.1 and Q.15 had me stumped. I forgot the method for depressed cubics so I couldn't even factorise the function in 1. As for 15, I don't understand how we solve the DE with an inequality? If it was an equation, then characteristic quadratic gives us the solution, but with a ≄, I have no clue.
No description
No description
46 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•6d ago
@Apu
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•6d ago
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Q.16 is also something I couldn't do, but that's a different topic, so, different thread?
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
For the 15th one, ig writing it as e^(-3x)(f''-3f')-e^(-3x)(2f'-6f)>=0 helps. This would give e^(-3x)(f'-2f) is increasing. Since e^(-3x) is decreasing this means f'-2f must be increasing (monotonic).
Dexter
Dexter•6d ago
1 seems okay enough? graph banalo or is it tough 😱
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
f(f(x)) ka graph?
Dexter
Dexter•6d ago
yeah just calculate f(f(x)) then plot the graph 6 degree equation banegi If roots are weird then idk what to do f(f(x)) ke derivative ke roots nikalne honge 😿 tedious work
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
This is doable Because f'(x) is factorable easily
Dexter
Dexter•6d ago
No description
Dexter
Dexter•6d ago
yeah actually lemme tru try Oh ok f'(f(x)) will change signs at -√3 0 √3 and 2 if f(fx) = 0 wala case lu to yeah just calculate f(fx) then check consecutive points jahan dy/dx = 0 hai that f(fx1) f(fx2) is positive or negative 7 roots aajaenge
hithav
hithav•6d ago
you have to check f'(x) also there will be 2 more critial pts -1 and +1 then you will get 7 roots question no 15 assume the function is Ae^2x+Be^3x (we take 2 and 3 because they are the roots of x^2-5x+6) and then satisfy f(0)=1 and f'(0)=0 conditions and then you will get f(x) to be 3e^2x-2e^3x so a =3 b =2 and h(0)=1 so ans is 5
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
I solved for f, but it's not equations, it's all inequalities. That's what confused me.
hithav
hithav•6d ago
there is equality also right so it doesnt matter 16 one all i got is the degree should be 4 or lower i am not getting anywhere after this
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Ok, that's just weird. Yeah It's going to be the no.of integral solutions of 625a+125b+25c+5d+e = 1500 Such that 0≤a,b,c,d,e≤24
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
In Q1, the minima of f(x) acquires a value of -1 rather than -3, so as for beta, there exists only one value of x such that f(x)=beta (Since beta<-1) [I made a slight error in the solution attached below.]
No description
No description
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Ig (c) and (d) are by curve sketching of f(x) Ah 16 would be a caseworking nightmare but here is something I thought of: Convert 1500 to base 25. Then 5a+b=(1500 in base 25) and we have info. about the number of digits in a and b. Does this logic work? :thinker: I'm not sure if the above works, but just something I thought of.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Just a moment, why 5a+b? Wouldn't it be 25a+b?
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Converting to base 25 covers positions of 1, 25 (the x^2 term), and so on but leaves out 5 (the x term), 125 and so on. Hence the multiplication by 5.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Nvm i understood 1500 = (2A0)_25 Where A denotes 10 2(625)+10(25)+0(1)
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Ig we know that b must be divisible by 5, so considering it 5k would allow us to use multinomial ig. b would be a 3-digit number while a would be a 2-digit one.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Rather messy, mb
No description
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
@SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
When using multinomial ig we would have to do intermediate calculations in base 25 right? To be on the safer side? Although that turns pretty hectic. Um..Is the answer 1 for 16th?
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
It's given 3
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Ah then I messed up :/
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Wait, I hope the solutions copy is out. I just have the answer key
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Ig there are exactly 301 such polynomials.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Does this work?
No description
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Unfortunately, I don't know how to do maths in base 25. Let me try and decode it.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Neither do I lmao. I just tried to deconstruct and reconstruct the numbers from base 25 to 10 in my head. Ig we dont need base 25 in the last 3 lines
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Ok, where did you get the choice expression? (a+k)C1 ?
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Beggar's method is not dependant on base (due to its derivation) so the expression remains same.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Ab ye beggar's method kya hota hai? :sweaty:
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
As for the value of the choice expression, that would also remain same due to its independancy from base. The (n+r-1)C(r-1) thing. I heard someone call it beggar's method so I used it.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
oh wait, (n+r-1)C(r-1)? I see.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Idk what anything's called honestly.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Oh, so we reduced it to no.of integral sols of a + k = 300
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Yeah. Well, if you have the solutions, do check if the value of k comes out to be 301.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
Sorry, I'm still a bit confused. We got this expression, but how did we figure out the set of allowed values for a,k? I think it'll be out around 7:30-8pm
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
The coeffecients of 1,x^2,x^4 are the digits of a. Since these can acquire values from 0 to 24, all numbers of upto 3 digits are valid. Similar logic for b.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
@SirLancelotDuLac
No description
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Yoo the method works šŸ™Œ I mean, this one is more intuitive, but the base changing thing really shortens stuff out.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
I still didnt understand the base change stuff šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø Gimme a bit.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•6d ago
Yeah, I didn't explain it nicely. This is not a universal method, just seemed to work here. We consider a number of base 25 because the digits will give us the coefficient of the polynomial. We have 625a+125b+25c+5d+e=1500 which can be written as (625a+25b+e)+5(25b+d)=1500 Let m be a base 25 number of the first bracket, and n be that of the second bracket. Then we have m+5n=(1500 in base 25), since a,b,c,d and e can acquire values from 0 to 24, m and n can acquire values of upto 3 digit and 2 digit numbers. Then let m=5k and apply beggar's method. Again, not a general method 'cuz coeffecients might not always vary from 0 to 24 or like-wise, but still in this particular case shortens stuff out.
Opt
OptOP•6d ago
I see. +solved @SirLancelotDuLac @hithav @Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•6d ago
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)
Time
<t:1745592857:R>
Solved by
<@1075951732460376214> (1075951732460376214), <@726641475080683522> (726641475080683522), <@1095655769376034818> (1095655769376034818)

Did you find this page helpful?