Organic

No description
16 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
can we judge the radical stablility by alpha hydrogen ?
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
Yes you can Hyperconjugation does act in radicals
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
oh in this case if no 3 hona chahye answer ? i dont have the answer key i am not sure
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
There's one catch here "Low temperature"
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
oh
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
Think about kinetic and thermodynamic products You'll get a bad mixture in this case to be very frank
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
was discussed very little in my class
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
But just for the sake of what the examiner is trying to ask, I think the answer should be A Ohh I see I can share a small article You can read that up dw
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
@Varun_Arora i googled it answer is C sir
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
Ohh I see Is the "low temperature" thing mentioned in that question as well ?
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
yess low temp we take kinetic stable product ?
Varun_Arora
Varun_Arora4mo ago
At low temperature, kinetic product prevails as the activation energy barrier is not met for the thermodynamically more stable product https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/59881/thermodynamic-vs-kinetic-reaction-control-with-radical-substitution You can read this for a more detailed discussion I think this thing is an overkill for an exam like NEST and they just mentioned the low temperature not considering all this Nvm Both kinetic and thermodynamic control are leading to the same product. My bad Sorry for confusing you on this You'll understand what I mean when you read the first answer on this
Akshat
AkshatOP4mo ago
oh +solved @Varun_Arora
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@905482015393062912> (905482015393062912)
Time
<t:1748675274:R>
Solved by
<@984016629119713290> (984016629119713290)

Did you find this page helpful?