NLM
I've already solved this normally, the issue is why can't i do it using constrained motion thing (Σ T.a=0)
Even if its not enough to solve the question, atleast i should get the correct relation from it, but it's completely wrong, so what's the issue
15 Replies
@Gyro Gearloose
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
here's the solution
we can solve using the 4 equations
pseudo force concept is used here
option A is correct and a° = 26 m/s²
Using T.a=0 you get acceleration of m1 is 2 to the left, which is not useful as we could already tell that
The constraint we could already see is just put again by this eqn again
These qs you can directly tell the constraint
Also a1 is the acceleration that is "relative" to the larger block, you must have not written correct expression i.e not written acceleration in ground frame
While writing T.a wala relation
I hope I'm understood
yep i understood now
noice
also I can't exactly "feel" why the upper block is going to the left
yeah tbh same, one way you can feel is the pseudo force ofc
it is greater than force of gravity on block2 hence it moves to left
ig with this we can get the feel
cause net pulling force is more towards left
i felt it in this way, when the bottom block goes up, the string slacks near the upper block, but ideal string must have same tension everywhere, so the upper block must go to the left, and there is no force acting to the left, so that's how i realised we need to use pseudo force
nah you're going in a effect---> cause dirn
go in a cause--->effect dirn
@Zoro from temu ok here?
+solved @Sephrina
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1275829425933385788> (1275829425933385788)
Time
<t:1749423474:R>
Solved by
<@888280831863451688> (888280831863451688)