I
iTeachChem3mo ago
nori

electrochem - sign error

I'm getting -5.2 mV. Why is it positive? I considered the cu2+ ions of cathode as reactant.
No description
12 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Sephrina
Sephrina3mo ago
can u show what work u did?
nori
noriOP3mo ago
e = -0.0591log(cu2+ anode/ cu2+ cathode)
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
Okay so my logic on this, you said reactant are Cu2+ molecules on cathode side, that's well and good for electrolysis to occur normally However what is asked here is "back potential" generated due to ion concentration imbalance Cu2+ concentration is greater at the anode than cathode, and copper reduction potential is positive, whereas only oxidation occurs at anode So copper ions must migrate to the cathode, in order to get reduced you can think of this Cathode: Cu---->Cu2+ Anode: Cu2+----> Cu Cuz conc of Cu2+ is reduced at anode (not using this rxn but to get an idea) I'm sure this is opposite to that of what you had considered (I hope it's not too long) Also note that reduction also doesn't happen at anode, that's just a purely fictional thing I've written, only the effect of back potential is generated These 2 equations actually don't occur, only to help you understand that your assumption maybe was wrong This back potential is overcome anyways by the battery And the process continues
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
No description
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
or maybe i just blabbered something this can be fully wrong watch a vid on concentration cells for better description
Sephrina
Sephrina3mo ago
and which one did u take as anode? because inverse log in negative of actual
nori
noriOP3mo ago
ah okay that makes sense thanks btw. appreciate it
coolguy.
coolguy.3mo ago
Np anytime Inka bhi opinion dekh lo I'm not so sure about my ans
nori
noriOP2mo ago
+solved @coolguy.
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1239101937866248205> (1239101937866248205)
Time
<t:1753383630:R>
Solved by
<@765933523705921606> (765933523705921606)

Did you find this page helpful?