10 Replies
@Gyro Gearloose
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.3?
Should be the first one no?
Oh mb, misread the question.
It should be 3 assuming the shell is very thin.
Tho if you draw a gaussian surface around the shell wouldn't the net charge enclosed be zero?
Yep, sorry marked the wrong option, it should be 3.
charge distribution will be like this thus field outside conductor is zero. field inside a charged spherical shell is also zero. so inside the conductor field depends on distance from -q
right?
so yes 3 ig
OK NOICE
I knew it but I wanted to prove to my friends that it's 3
+solved @SirLancelotDuLac @hardcoreisdead
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@964432960197632059> (964432960197632059)
Time
<t:1749532545:R>
Solved by
<@1075951732460376214> (1075951732460376214), <@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)