proving inequality w/ mathematical induction

15 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Apu
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
I think something's wrong with how i am using the inductive hypothesis
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
No description
SirLancelotDuLac
Wait, how did the log(n+1) become log(n)+log(1)?
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
sigh you're right hotdamn big, big mistake hmm i wasn't using the tool properly. i will try a different approach and post the updated proof.
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
there. i think i am satisfied with it now.
SirLancelotDuLac
I do not quite agree with this.
No description
SirLancelotDuLac
a>=b for all n is false, it might be that a<b for some values of n and a>=b for other values of n.
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
hmm so what you're trying to say is: $$ \begin{aligned} &(\forall n>9)[2n^{3}\geq (n+1)^{3}] & \text{- false} \ \implies&\neg(\forall n>9)[2n^{3}\geq (n+1)^{3}] & \text{- true} \ \implies & (\exists n>9)[2n^{3} < (n+1)^{3}] & \text{-true} \end{aligned} $$
TeXit
TeXit3mo ago
capn' catto
No description
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
and yea, in that sense, to induce contradiction, i technically need to check for every single n. which is not really possible, and without checking everything, this is always a possibility sigh. i am stuck. chatgpt helped me a bit (about the comparision thing), and i got my hands dirty to find some ideas
capn' catto
capn' cattoOP3mo ago
i think this should be good? pleasee review! man i learned a lot: - don't f with log if you don't need to - get your hands dirty EVEN if it's not a problem to solve - don't overestimate your abilities (i thought i had nailed things down TWICE)

Did you find this page helpful?