K
Kord•5mo ago
marian

Use access token from oauth

Does kord support using an access token gained from the oauth flow instead of a bot token? I want to fetch the user from which I received an access token but I'm getting the following error 
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]: dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestException: REST request returned an error: 401   401: Unauthorized null
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestHandler.handle(KtorRequestHandler.kt:60)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestHandler$handle$1.invokeSuspend(KtorRequestHandler.kt)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:100)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:173)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:166)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:472)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:569)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:998)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]: dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestException: REST request returned an error: 401   401: Unauthorized null
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestHandler.handle(KtorRequestHandler.kt:60)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at dev.kord.rest.request.KtorRequestHandler$handle$1.invokeSuspend(KtorRequestHandler.kt)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.BaseContinuationImpl.resumeWith(ContinuationImpl.kt:33)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at kotlinx.coroutines.DispatchedTask.run(DispatchedTask.kt:100)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:173)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:166)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:472)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:569)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:998)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
Jul 12 22:20:40 java[2272185]:         at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
with the following code 
val discordRestClient = RestClient(accessToken.accessToken)
val discordSelfUser = discordRestClient.user.getCurrentUser()
val discordRestClient = RestClient(accessToken.accessToken)
val discordSelfUser = discordRestClient.user.getCurrentUser()
Solution:
it's a different type of authorization token, so the header would need to be modified
Jump to solution
4 Replies
g
g•5mo ago
Kord's a bot library, so while I'm not 10000% sure, I doubt it would
Solution
g
g•5mo ago
it's a different type of authorization token, so the header would need to be modified
g
g•5mo ago
and yeah those tokens don't really have anything to do with the bot API
marian
marianOP•5mo ago
yeah true though the selfuser route is the same was worth a try ill just quickly write this myself, thank you

Did you find this page helpful?